Abstract:Purpose: The gender gap in promotion in academic medicine is well established. However, few studies have reported gender differences in promotion adjusted for scholarly production and national or international reputation, namely, career duration, publications, grant funding, and leadership positions. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the differences between men and women in achieving benchmarks for promotion and analyze where such differences lie geographically and within specialties. Method: A systematic search of Academic Search Premier, Business Source Complete, Cochrane Library, ERIC, GenderWatch, Google Scholar, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to August 17, 2022. All studies that reported the number of male and female full professors on medical school faculty were included. The primary outcome was the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for promotion to full professor for women compared with men. Results: Two hundred forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The unadjusted OR for promotion to full professor for women was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.41). Sixteen studies reported an AOR. The pooled AOR of promotion for women to full professor was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.46-0.77). The AOR for promotion to full professor was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.34-0.88) in surgery and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.57-1.11) in internal medicine. Statistical heterogeneity was high ( Q = 66.6, I2 = 79.4%, P < .001). On meta-regression, 77% of the heterogeneity was from studies outside the United States, where more disparity was reported (AOR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.22-0.38). Conclusions: Most studies continued to find decreased promotion of women. Gender disparity was particularly notable in surgery and in studies from outside the United States. The results suggest that differences in promotion were due to differences in productivity and leadership and to gender bias.

Gender disparities in promotions and exiting in UK Russell Group universities

Gendered hiring and attrition on the path to parity for academic faculty

Gender bias in teaching evaluations: the causal role of department gender composition

Gender gap in faculty promotion

Does a gender disparity exist in academic rank? Evidence from an Australian university

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

Gender Segregation: Analysis across Sectoral-Dominance in the UK Labour Market

The gender gap in executive promotions

Gender Bias in Academic Recruitment? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in the Nordic Region

Gender bias in academic recruitment

Predictors and Socio-Demographic Disparities in STEM Degree Outcomes: A UK Longitudinal Study using Hierarchical Logistic Regression

Gender discrimination and perceived fairness in the promotion process of hotel employees

Gender Disparities in Nobel Prize Winning Labs. A Look into Glass Ceilings, Maternal Walls and Bottlenecks

‘Being good isn’t good enough’: gender discrimination in Italian academia

Entering a gender-neutral workplace? College students' expectations and the impact of information provision

Gender segregation: analysis across sectoral dominance in the UK labour market

Gender disparities in accounting academia: analysis from the lens of publications

Underrepresented minority faculty in the USA face a double standard in promotion and tenure decisions

The role of gender in promotion rates in the Australian Finance Industry

Gendered perceptions of career advancement barriers: Unveiling challenges to female corporate leadership development

Gender Disparity in Full Professor Rank Among Academic Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis