Abstract:While anecdotes suggest that workplace gender disparities widely exist, the current literature on this topic has not provided sufficient causal evidence due to two deficiencies. First, because most gender studies rely on surveys and laboratory experiments, causal evidence of gender disparities in the field is rare; Second, because most empirical gender studies focus on individual workers or C-suite executives, research on low-level managers using real-world personnel data is also rare. In this study, we aim to address these deficiencies by empirically studying the effect of gender on the job assignment of frontline managers in a large sportswear retail chain using personnel, sales, and operational data. Our estimation strategy is a two-step fixed effects panel estimation framework, which 1) separately identifies manager fixed effects and store fixed effects by exploring manager switches across stores; and 2) estimates the effect of gender on store-manager assignment while controlling for the estimated manager fixed effects from the first step. This framework allows us to uncover causal evidence for the existence of gender bias in store-manager assignment—male managers were more likely than their female counterparts to be assigned to stores with higher sales potential, i.e., core stores, stores with a higher sales target, or stores with a larger number of sales clerks. To support this finding, we test three alternative hypotheses. First, we find that male managers achieved similar store sales when replacing their female counterparts in the same stores and vice versa, and male managers were not better at managing the turnover of sales clerks, neither of which supports an alternative hypothesis of differential managerial abilities; Second, we conduct a maximum likelihood estimation of a discrete-time Markov chain that models the processes of store-manager assignment and manager turnover, and do not find evidence to support the hypothesis that the observed gender inequity in store-manager assignment is driven by different gender preferences to leave stores with low sales potential. Third, we find that male sales clerks or male store managers on average made similar individual sales as their female counterparts, thereby not supporting a career selection bias hypothesis that men working at this retailer on average have higher sales abilities than women. Translating our findings into an actionable insight, we develop a gender inequity index (GII) to help organizations measure potential gender bias in job assignment. Applying this index to a simulation study using the retailer’s manager compensation data, we demonstrate the implications of gender-biased job assignment on the gender pay gap.

The role of gender in promotion rates in the Australian Finance Industry

Potential and the Gender Promotions Gap

Gender discrimination and perceived fairness in the promotion process of hotel employees

The gender gap in executive promotions

Gender Disparity in Full Professor Rank Among Academic Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gender disparities in promotions and exiting in UK Russell Group universities

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

Women's Experiences of Promotion and Tenure in Academic Medicine and Potential Implications for Gender Disparities in Career Advancement: A Qualitative Analysis

Modeling gender differences in the job promotion process: Replication and extension of Martell et al. (1996).

Organizational commitments to equality change how people view women's and men's professional success

Women’s Experiences of Promotion and Tenure in Academic Medicine and Potential Implications for Gender Disparities in Career Advancement

Does a gender disparity exist in academic rank? Evidence from an Australian university

Gender Still Matters: Towards Sustainable Progress for Women in Australian Film and Television Industries

Association of a Simulated Institutional Gender Equity Initiative With Gender-Based Disparities in Medical School Faculty Salaries and Promotions

Why Do Women Struggle to Climb the Corporate Ladder? Evidence from Retail Frontline Managers

Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: A retrospective analysis

AFLW and the gender gap: an analysis of public attitudes towards the Women's Australian Football League

Female Board Representation and Corporate Performance: A Review and New Estimates for Australia

Gender Differences in Retention and Promotion Among Generalists Who Graduated From Research-Intensive Fellowships

Gender Discrimination? Evidence from the Belgian Public Accounting Profession