Gendered hiring and attrition on the path to parity for academic faculty

Nicholas LaBerge,K. Hunter Wapman,Aaron Clauset,Daniel B. Larremore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.13.562268

2024-04-30

Abstract:Despite long-running efforts to increase gender diversity among tenured and tenure track faculty in the U.S., women remain underrepresented in most academic fields, sometimes dramatically so. Here we quantify the relative importance of faculty hiring and faculty attrition for both past and future faculty gender diversity using comprehensive data on the training and employment of 268,769 tenured and tenure-track faculty rostered at 12,112 U.S. PhD-granting departments, spanning 111 academic fields between 2011–2020. Over this time, we find that hiring had a far greater impact on women’s representation among faculty than attrition in the majority (90.1%) of academic fields, even as academia loses a higher share of women faculty relative to men at every career stage. Finally, we model the impact of five specific policy interventions on women’s representation, and project that eliminating attrition differences between women and men only leads to a marginal increase in women’s overall representation—in most fields, successful interventions will need to make substantial and sustained changes to hiring in order to reach gender parity.

Scientific Communication and Education

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses the issue of achieving gender equality in academia. The research found that despite an increase in representation of women at the undergraduate and doctoral levels over the past 50 years, there is still a severe lack of women in tenured and tenure-track positions. The paper quantifies the relative impact of recruitment and attrition on the representation of women in academia by analyzing the data of 268,769 faculty members in US doctoral departments from 2011 to 2020. The study shows that in the majority of disciplines (90.1%), recruitment has a greater proportionate impact on female faculty than attrition, even though women have higher attrition rates compared to men at every career stage.

The paper also presents a hypothetical scenario of eliminating the attrition caused by gender differences, and the results show that this would only lead to a slight increase in overall female representation. To achieve gender equality, the study suggests substantive and sustained changes need to be made in recruitment practices. The paper simulates the effects of five specific policy interventions, including increasing the proportion of female recruitment and achieving gender-neutral attrition rates, and predicts the future development of gender diversity.

The research indicates that in the past decade, recruitment has made the largest contribution to the growth of female representation in academia, and attrition (including retirement) has also played a role in increasing female representation in 74% of disciplines. However, attrition can also lead to a decrease in female representation, especially in early and mid-career stages. The paper emphasizes that reducing attrition differences alone is not enough to achieve gender equality; the key lies in improving recruitment practices.