Electrically Tuning Ultrafiltration Behavior for Efficient Water Purification

Min Li,Kuichang Zuo,Shuai Liang,Kang Xiao,Peng Liang,Xiaomao Wang,Xia Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02441

2020-08-25

Abstract:Conventional ultrafiltration (UF) technology suffers from membrane fouling and limited separation performance. This work demonstrates a novel electrical tuning strategy to improve the separation efficiency of the UF process. An electrically enhanced UF (EUF) system with two sets of oppositely placed membrane–electrode modules was set up. A series of multicycle treatment experiments were conducted to reveal the performance and tuning mechanism of the EUF system. The applied electrical tuning operation brought about an up to 68% reduction of average transmembrane pressure increasing rate (<i>R</i>_p), indicating a strong capability in inhibiting membrane fouling. This fouling reduction can be mainly ascribed to the applied electrophoretic force, changes in solution chemistry, and generation of peroxide, which repulses foulants away from the membrane, hampers foulant adsorption owing to enhanced electrostatic repulsion, and degrades foulants, respectively. The 1.2 V voltage was identified as an effective voltage for stably inhibiting membrane fouling. Besides, the electrical tuning operation led to an up to ∼32% increase in foulant retention rate (φ) owing to both non-Faradaic effects (including electrosorption and electrophoretic repulsion) and Faradaic oxidative degradation. Moreover, the electrical tuning operation allowed a remarkable desalination capability with a significantly higher desalination rate and an up to ∼43% greater salt adsorption capacity as compared with a conventional capacitive deionization process. Additionally, the EUF system achieved a good performance in removing heavy metals (Ag, Cu, Pb, Se, and Sb). The overall enhanced EUF performance suggests promising prospects for practical applications.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c02441?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c02441</a>.Figure S1, Configuration diagram of the control cell without the PVDF UF membranes; Figure S2, configuration diagram of the CDI cell; Figure S3, comparison of mSAC and charge efficiency within the voltage range of 0.8–1.4 V; Figure S4, comparison of salt removal rates between the EUF and control systems during the multicycle EUF experiments; Figure S5, comparison of desalination performance in terms of SAC and Λ between the EUF and the control systems during the multicycle EUF experiments; Figure S6, variations of the effluent salt concentration and electric current of the CDI control and EUF systems during the desalination experiments; Figure S7, variation of effluent conductivity when an opposite voltage (−1.2 V) was applied at the discharging stage; Figure S8, example demonstrating the potential of the EUF system for treatment performance improvement; Figure S9, physicochemical properties of PVDF membrane and carbon cloth; Figure S10, cyclic voltammetry curve of the carbon cloth electrode; Figure S11, comparison of average removal rates and effluent concentrations of typical heavy metals including Ag, Cu, Se, Pb, and Sb in the EUF tests; Figure S12, variation of effluent pH on the cathode side and measured electrode potentials to the Ag/AgCl reference electrode at different applied voltages during the heavy metal removal experiments; Appendix Section I, physicochemical properties of PVDF membrane and carbon cloth; Appendix Section II, modeling and calculation of the force balance between the permeate drag force and electrophoretic force; and Appendix Section III, demonstration of the heavy metal removal performance of the EUF process (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.est.0c02441/suppl_file/es0c02441_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental