Force system of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners made of shape memory polymers: an in vitro study

Madina Sharif Christoph Bourauel Ahmed Ghoneima Jörg Schwarze Abdulaziz Alhotan Tarek M. Elshazly a Oral Technology Department,Dental School,University Hospital Bonn,Bonn,Germanyb Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry,Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine (HBMCDM),Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU),Dubai,UAEc Private Clinic,Cologne,Germanyd Department of Dental Health,College of Applied Medical Sciences,King Saud University,Riyadh,Saudi Arabia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2024.2361857
IF: 10.6
2024-06-12
Virtual and Physical Prototyping
Abstract:This study aimed to report forces and moments delivered by 3D-printed aligners. Tera Harz TC-85 resin and Zendura FLX (ZF) thermoformed sheets (0.76 mm) were used. Rectangular strip specimens (50 × 10 × 0.6 mm) were produced for a three-point bending test (3PB) at different temperatures. Full anatomical aligners were produced for 3D force measurements on different teeth and directions at 37 °C, using a custom-made device. ZF exhibited flexural forces between 1.7 and 2.3 N, while TC-85 from 0.3 N to 2.7 N, with temperature affecting TC-85 more significantly. At lower temperatures, TC-85 was stiffer than ZF, but at higher temperatures, it became less rigid. The 3D-force measurements indicated comparable values for both materials. Force ranged from 0.3–1.7 N and moment from 4.8–9.4 Nmm. The study concluded that TC-85 3D-printed aligners deliver biologically compatible forces for orthodontic movement and offer better control over thickness.
engineering, manufacturing,materials science, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3D - printed orthodontic braces (especially those made of shape - memory polymers) under different temperature conditions and compare them with traditional thermoformed braces. Specifically, the research aims to answer the following key questions: 1. **Material Properties**: What are the differences in the forces and moments generated by 3D - printed Tera Harz TC - 85 resin braces and traditional thermoformed Zendura FLX braces under different temperature conditions? 2. **Temperature Dependence**: How do the mechanical properties of these materials change at different temperatures? Especially at oral temperature (37°C), do their performances meet the requirements of biocompatibility and clinical applications? 3. **Tooth Movement Effects**: When simulating different tooth movement directions, are the forces and moments generated by these two materials within the recommended orthodontic range? ### Research Background Although traditional orthodontic clear braces are becoming more and more popular, they have some limitations, such as requiring multiple braces for each treatment, increasing plastic consumption and environmental burden, etc. In addition, the traditional thermoforming process may affect the mechanical properties of the material. Therefore, researchers hope that by introducing 3D printing technology and shape - memory polymers (SMPs), these limitations can be overcome and more accurate and efficient orthodontic solutions can be provided. ### Main Findings 1. **Bending Test Results**: - The maximum bending force values of Zendura FLX (ZF) are relatively stable at different temperatures, ranging from 1.7 N to 2.3 N. - The maximum bending force values of Tera Harz TC - 85 (TC - 85) change significantly with temperature, ranging from 0.3 N to 2.7 N. At lower temperatures (20°C and 25°C), TC - 85 exhibits higher stiffness; while at higher temperatures (37°C and 40°C), its stiffness decreases significantly. 2. **3D Force Measurement Results**: - At 37°C, the forces and moments generated by the two materials are generally comparable, although there are significant differences in some movement directions. - For different tooth movements (such as retraction / protraction, labiolingual translation and mesiodistal rotation), the force and moment values generated by the two materials are different, but all are within the recommended orthodontic range. ### Conclusions The research shows that the forces generated by Tera Harz TC - 85 3D - printed braces at oral temperature meet the biocompatibility requirements and have better thickness control ability. Its shape - memory property enables it to maintain an effective correction effect for a long time, showing great adaptability to incremental step lengths. In contrast, although traditional thermoformed materials (such as Zendura FLX) perform well at room temperature, they may experience significant force attenuation at oral temperature. In general, this research provides important mechanical data support for the application of 3D - printed orthodontic braces, indicating that this new technology is expected to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of orthodontic treatment.