Global monitoring for biodiversity: Uncertainty, risk, and power analyses to support trend change detection

Brian Leung,Andrew Gonzalez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj1448
IF: 13.6
2024-02-18
Science Advances
Abstract:Global targets aim to reverse biodiversity declines by 2050 but require knowledge of current trends and future projections under policy intervention. First, given uncertainty in measurement of current trends, we propose a risk framework, considering probability and magnitude of decline. While only 11 of 198 systems analyzed (taxonomic groups by country from the Living Planet Database) showed declining abundance with high certainty, 20% of systems had a 70% chance of strong declines. Society needs to decide acceptable risks of biodiversity loss. Second, we calculated statistical power to detect trend change using ~12,000 populations from 62 systems currently showing strong declines. Current trend uncertainty hinders our ability to assess improvements. Trend change is detectable with high certainty in only 14 systems, even if thousands of populations are sampled, and conservation action reduces net declines to zero immediately, on average. We provide potential solutions to improve monitoring of progress toward biodiversity targets.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems Addressed by the Paper This paper primarily focuses on the issue of monitoring global biodiversity, particularly how to assess and detect changes in biodiversity trends in the presence of uncertainty. Specifically, the authors raise the following key issues: 1. **Uncertainty in Current Trends**: - There is significant uncertainty in the current measurement of biodiversity trends. This uncertainty not only affects our understanding of current trends but also hinders our ability to evaluate the effectiveness of future policy interventions. - For example, in the analysis of 198 systems (including different countries and taxa), only 11 systems showed a high certainty of declining trends, but 20% of the systems had a 70% probability of significant decline. 2. **Need for a Risk-Based Framework**: - The authors propose the need for a risk-based framework to assess the declining trends in biodiversity, considering the probability and magnitude of decline. Society needs to decide on the acceptable risk level of biodiversity loss. 3. **Insufficient Statistical Power**: - Current data and monitoring capabilities are insufficient to detect changes in trends. Even when sampling thousands of populations, only 14 systems could detect trend changes with high certainty. - This means that even if conservation actions immediately reduce net decline, we may still be unable to reliably detect these changes. 4. **Improvement of Monitoring Framework**: - The authors propose several potential solutions to improve monitoring capabilities, including increasing monitoring efforts, adjusting the thresholds for evaluating conservation outcomes, and using fixed reference thresholds for assessment. - These methods aim to enhance our ability to detect changes in biodiversity trends, thereby better evaluating the effectiveness of conservation actions. ### Summary The core issue of the paper is: how to effectively monitor and assess global biodiversity trends in the presence of significant uncertainty and data insufficiency, to support the goal of reversing biodiversity decline by 2050. By proposing a risk-based framework, statistical power analysis, and specific solutions, the authors aim to provide scientific basis and practical recommendations for global biodiversity monitoring.