Abstract:Despite their potential for supporting the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, comparative extinction risk models have faced limited uptake since their output cannot be directly used to inform the Red List assessments. We addressed this gap by predicting the probability of global bird species to be threatened under each individual Red List criterion (as opposed to predicting Red List categories). Our approach outperforms classical models at identifying threatened species and provides outputs that can effectively support the work of assessors. Our study yields key insights that could amplify the uptake of extinction risk models into Red List assessments. Comparative extinction risk analysis—which predicts species extinction risk from correlation with traits or geographical characteristics—has gained research attention as a promising tool to support extinction risk assessment in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. However, its uptake has been very limited so far, possibly because existing models only predict a species' Red List category, without indicating which Red List criteria may be triggered. This prevents such approaches to be integrated into Red List assessments. We overcome this implementation gap by developing models that predict the probability of species meeting individual Red List criteria. Using data on the world's birds, we evaluated the predictive performance of our criterion‐specific models and compared it with the typical criterion‐blind modelling approach. We compiled data on biological traits (e.g. range size, clutch size) and external drivers (e.g. change in canopy cover) often associated with extinction risk. For each specific criterion, we modelled the relationship between extinction risk predictors and species' Red List category under that criterion using ordinal regression models. We found criterion‐specific models were better at identifying threatened species compared to a criterion‐blind model (higher sensitivity), but less good at identifying not threatened species (lower specificity). As expected, different covariates were important for predicting extinction risk under different criteria. Change in annual temperature was important for criteria related to population trends, while high forest dependency was important for criteria related to restricted area of occupancy or small population size. Our criteria‐specific method can support Red List assessors by producing outputs that identify species likely to meet specific criteria, and which are the most important predictors. These species can then be prioritised for re‐evaluation. We expect this new approach to increase the uptake of extinction risk models in Red List assessments, bridging a long‐standing research‐implementation gap.

Towards a general framework for predicting threat status of data-deficient species from phylogenetic, spatial and environmental information

Modelling Species Distributions with Deep Learning to Predict Plant Extinction Risk and Assess Climate Change Impacts

Predicting tree distributions in an East African biodiversity hotspot: model selection, data bias and envelope uncertainty

Spatiophylogenetic modelling of extinction risk reveals evolutionary distinctiveness and brief flowering period as threats in a hotspot plant genus

A trait‐based approach for predicting species responses to environmental change from sparse data: how well might terrestrial mammals track climate change?

Are protected areas tracking threats to terrestrial biodiversity?

Overcoming the Linnean shortfall: Data deficiency and biological survey priorities

A New Method for Low Density Distribution Modeling and Near Threatened Species: The Study Case of Plectrohyla Guatemalensis

Inferring the extinction risk of Data Deficient and Not Evaluated Australian squamates

Comparing predictions of IUCN Red List categories from machine learning and other methods for bats

Modeling the geographic spread and proliferation of invasive alien plants (IAPs) into new ecosystems using multi-source data and multiple predictive models in the Heuningnes catchment, South Africa

Capability of big data to capture threatened vertebrate diversity in protected areas

Scalable phylogenetic Gaussian process models improve the detectability of environmental signals on local extinctions for many Red List species

Biodiversity shows unique responses to land-use change across regional biomes

Revealing uncertainty in the status of biodiversity change

Threats to reptiles at global and regional scales

Modelling the probability of meeting IUCN Red List criteria to support reassessments

Beyond a diagnostic tool: Validating standardized Mahalanobis distance as a species distribution model for invasive alien species in North America

Dealing with sampling bias and inferring absence data to improve distribution models of a widely distributed vulnerable marsupial

Combined phylogenetic and geographic data can predict plant-pest interactions with high accuracy

Anticipating anthropogenic threats in acquiring new protected areas