Abstract:Threatened species are by definition species that are in need of assistance. In the absence of suitable conservation interventions, they are likely to disappear soon 1 . There is limited understanding of how and where conservation interventions are applied globally, or how well they work 2,3 . Here, using information from the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List and other global databases, we find that for species at risk from three of the biggest drivers of biodiversity loss—habitat loss, overexploitation for international trade and invasive species 4 —many appear to lack the appropriate types of conservation interventions. Indeed, although there has been substantial recent expansion of the protected area network, we still find that 91% of threatened species have insufficient representation of their habitats within protected areas. Conservation interventions are not implemented uniformly across different taxa and regions and, even when present, have infrequently led to substantial improvements in the status of species. For 58% of the world's threatened terrestrial species, we find conservation interventions to be notably insufficient or absent. We cannot determine whether such species are truly neglected, or whether efforts to recover them are not included in major conservation databases. If they are indeed neglected, the outlook for many of the world's threatened species is grim without more and better targeted action.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to reveal the shortcomings of global biodiversity conservation actions, particularly for endangered species threatened by habitat loss, overexploitation through international trade, and invasive species. The study found that despite the expansion of protected area networks in recent years, 91% of threatened species still lack sufficient protection in their habitats. Specifically, for species threatened by habitat loss, overexploitation through international trade, and invasive species, many species seem to lack corresponding conservation measures. For example, only 76% of species threatened by overexploitation through international trade are subjected to international trade controls; among species threatened by habitat loss, only 9% are adequately represented in protected areas, reaching the target threshold; and for species threatened by invasive species, only 15% have recorded measures for invasive species control. The study also points out that the implementation of conservation interventions is uneven among different taxa and regions, and even with existing conservation measures, species status often fails to significantly improve. Moreover, 58% of threatened species on terrestrial land worldwide lack meaningful habitat protection or any other documented conservation interventions. This proportion is even higher for certain taxa like amphibians, reaching 84%, compared to only 44% for birds. The paper emphasizes that although conservation actions can delay species extinction, inadequate funding and lack of targeted conservation measures lead to a reduction in the number of species that could potentially be saved. To improve the outlook for biodiversity, increased resource investment is needed along with more effective allocation of existing scarce resources. This means identifying which conservation interventions can effectively reduce the risk of species extinction and where these interventions should be implemented. However, the study shows that many threatened species may be overlooked or efforts to restore them are not included in major conservation databases, which dims the future prospects of many threatened species globally unless more proactive and targeted actions are taken.

Global shortfalls in documented actions to conserve biodiversity