Abstract:The development of solid-state batteries has gained significant attention in recent years, owing to their potential to enhance the temperature range and energy density of energy storage devices. Sulfide-based electrolytes are some of the most promising candidates for solid-state batteries, thanks to their high ionic conductivity and low processing temperature. For lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, the transition from liquid to solid electrolytes holds even greater promise. Sulfur is a readily available cathode material known for its high specific capacity, which endows Li-S batteries with remarkable specific energy and favourable environmental and economic impact. In liquid electrolytes however, the solubility of sulfur and lithium polysulfide causes a multitude of issues that hamper the performance of the Li-S system: rapid self-discharge, redox shuttle mechanism during charging, and loss of active sulfur and lithium material due to direct chemical reactivity. Solid-state Li-S cells are not prone to these issues, but they have, of course, issues of their own. Amongst them, the stability of the interface between the electrolyte and the lithium is of crucial importance to allow the use of this very high energy density negative electrode. In the present study, we compare two sulfide electrolytes, Li 6 PS 5 Cl and Li 7 P 3 S 11 , and assess their respective stability against lithium. We used innovative methods to characterize the interphase between the sulfide and the lithium without damaging it upon dismantling the cell. The nature and the properties of this interphase was characterised via EIS, XPS and ToF-SIMS. The EIS study showed that Li 6 PS 5 Cl forms a much more stable interphase with lithium than Li 7 P 3 S 11 , which is in accordance with most recent results in the literature. The XPS study confirmed the chemical composition of the interphase. Li 2 S and Li 3 P were present for both electrolytes. In the case of Li 6 PS 5 Cl, LiCl was also identified as expected. Gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) assisted abrasion of the interphase followed by in-situ XPS and ToF-SIMS suggested a separation of the components of the interphase depending on the depth of the abrasion. The interphase was found to be organised as Li 2 S-, Li 3 P- or LiCl-rich discrete layers, with the Li 2 S-rich layer being consistently the closest to lithium. This result confirms and completes the most recent research in the field published by Otto et al. in 2022 (doi: 10.1002/admi.202102387). To establish solid-state batteries as a practical energy storage option, it is essential to fully understand and effectively manage the Li-electrolyte interface. These findings suggest that thanks to the relative stability of its interface with lithium, Li 6 PS 5 Cl is the better option for solid-state lithium metal cells. It also sheds light on the reasons why this interface is more stable. The self-assembled lamellar structure of the interphase could also inspire strategies to better control the stability of solid electrolytes versus lithium.

Investigating dry room compatibility of sulfide solid-state electrolytes for scalable manufacturing

Investigating Dry Room Compatibility of Chloride Solid-State Electrolytes for Scalable Manufacturing

Surface molecular engineering to enable processing of sulfide solid electrolytes in humid ambient air

Influence of Atmospheric Gas Species on an Argyrodite‐Type Sulfide Solid Electrolyte During Moisture Exposure

Materials Design Principles for Air‐Stable Lithium/Sodium Solid Electrolytes

Unraveling the Origin of Moisture Stability of Halide Solid-State Electrolytes by In Situ and Operando Synchrotron X-ray Analytical Techniques

Examining Electrochemical and Mechanical Behavior of Amorphous and Crystalline Sulfide-Based Solid-State Electrolytes

Evidencing Phase Transformations of Li 6 PS 5 Cl Argyrodite under Ambient Air and Dry Room Exposure

Chemical stability of sulfide solid-state electrolytes: stability toward humid air and compatibility with solvents and binders

Enhancing Moisture Stability of Sulfide Solid-State Electrolytes by Reversible Amphipathic Molecular Coating

Promoting favorable interfacial properties in lithium-based batteries using chlorine-rich sulfide inorganic solid-state electrolytes

Enhancing Moisture and Electrochemical Stability of the Li5.5PS4.5Cl1.5 Electrolyte by Oxygen Doping.

Sn‐O Dual‐Substituted Chlorine‐Rich Argyrodite Electrolyte with Enhanced Moisture and Electrochemical Stability

Majorizing Structural Design and Unraveling Synergistic Mechanisms in Sulfide Electrolytes Via Cationic and Anionic Modulation

Evidencing Phase Transformations of Li6PS5Cl Argyrodite under Ambient Air and Dry Room Exposure

Operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of solid electrolyte interphase formation and evolution in Li2S-P2S5 solid-state electrolytes

Sn-Substituted Argyrodite Li6PS5Cl Solid Electrolyte for Improving Interfacial and Atmospheric Stability

Atomic Insights into the Oxidative Degradation Mechanisms of Sulfide Solid Electrolytes

Sulfide-Based Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: An in-Depth Study of the Li-Electrolyte Interface

Re-sintering induced ionic conductivity recovery for air-exposed Li5.4PS4.4Cl1.6 argyrodite sulfide electrolyte

Incorporation of halogens (Cl, Br, and I) in an Li–P–S–O system for exploring new sulfide solid electrolytes with high conductivity and superior electrochemical performance in solid-state batteries