Abstract:Many studies have found that WLTC (The Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycles) doesn’t accord well to real driving in different regions and it’s necessary to develop local test cycles. China announced its local test cycle in 2019: CLTC (China light-duty vehicle test cycle). To evaluate vehicle emission under different cycles, one conventional gasoline vehicle and its hybrid counterpart were tested on the chassis dynamometer following CLTC, WLTC, and RDE (Real Driving Emission). The fuel consumption between WLTC and RDE is at the same level. While for the conventional, CLTC fuel consumption is 8.41% higher than WLTC and for the hybrid, it’s 20.23% lower than WLTC. To get better vehicle fuel efficiency, vehicle application scenarios must be considered. Frequent re-start and longer warm-up time of the hybrid leads to high CO emission than the conventional. High engine speed could result in instantaneous CO spikes and with these spikes, 25% of the total CO could be emitted in less than 10 s. For the conventional, NOx emitted during engine warm-up occupied 85.39%, 87.02%, 43.06%, 31.98%, and 55.43% of the total NOx respectively for CLTC, WLTC and three RDE tests. NOx emitted from the hybrid is less than 10% of the conventional due to lower engine load and less fuel enrichment. Hybrid particle emission is under good control with the equipment of the gasoline particle filter, but the regeneration might increase thin particle exposure to the public. For most pollutants, CLTC doesn't close the gap between laboratory tests and real driving.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the impacts of different driving cycles (such as CLTC, WLTC and RDE) on the fuel consumption and emission performance of light - duty conventional and hybrid vehicles, in order to explore whether the Chinese local test cycle (CLTC) can narrow the gap between laboratory tests and actual road driving. Specifically, the research evaluates the effectiveness of CLTC by comparing and analyzing the fuel consumption (in g/km CO₂) and emissions (CO, NOx and PN) performance under these different test cycles, and provides improvement suggestions for the regeneration strategy of gasoline particulate filters (GPF) to reduce the risk of the public being exposed to fine particulate matter. ### Research Background and Problem Statement 1. **Global Transportation Energy Consumption and Emission Problems** - The fuel consumption and emissions of light - duty vehicles are a major part of global transportation energy consumption and an important source of air pollution. - The European Union and China have successively introduced more stringent emission regulations (such as Euro 6 and China 6) to reduce pollutant emissions. 2. **Limitations of Existing Test Cycles** - NEDC (New European Driving Cycle) is considered to be too smooth and cannot truly reflect the actual operating conditions of vehicles. - WLTC (Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycles) is closer to actual driving conditions than NEDC, but there is still a certain gap. - In 2019, China launched its own local test cycle CLTC (China light - duty vehicle test cycle), aiming to better reflect China's actual driving conditions. 3. **Research Objectives** - Evaluate the fuel consumption and emission performance of light - duty conventional and hybrid vehicles under CLTC, WLTC and RDE (Real Driving Emission) test cycles. - Explore whether CLTC can effectively narrow the gap between laboratory tests and actual road driving. - Propose suggestions for improving the GPF regeneration strategy to reduce fine particulate matter emissions. ### Main Findings - **Fuel Consumption** - For conventional gasoline vehicles, the fuel consumption of CLTC is 8.41% higher than that of WLTC, while the fuel consumption of hybrid vehicles under CLTC is 20.23% lower than that of WLTC. - The fuel consumption under RDE test is comparable to that of WLTC, but higher than that of CLTC. - **CO Emissions** - The CO emission factor of hybrid vehicles is higher than that of conventional vehicles in all test cycles, mainly because of the frequent start - up and longer warm - up time of hybrid vehicles. - High engine load and high speed will lead to instantaneous CO emission peaks, and these peaks emit more than 25% of the total CO within less than 10 seconds. - **NOx Emissions** - The NOx emissions of conventional vehicles during the warm - up period account for 85.39% - 55.43% of the total emissions. - The NOx emissions of hybrid vehicles are significantly lower than those of conventional vehicles, mainly because the engine load of hybrid vehicles is lower and the combustion temperature is also correspondingly reduced. - **Particulate Matter (PN) Emissions** - All tests meet the China 6b standard (6.0*10^11#/km). - The distance - specific PN emissions of conventional vehicles under CLTC are the highest, and nearly 30% of PN is emitted during the warm - up period. ### Conclusions - CLTC can indeed better reflect China's actual driving conditions in some aspects, but in terms of fuel consumption and emission performance, it still fails to completely close the gap between laboratory tests and actual road driving. - Hybrid vehicles have better fuel economy and emission performance in urban driving than conventional vehicles, but their performance in rural areas and on highways is not as good as that of conventional vehicles. - Improving the regeneration strategy of GPF can further reduce the emissions of fine particulate matter and reduce the public health risk.

Fuel consumption and emission performance from light-duty conventional/hybrid-electric vehicles over different cycles and real driving tests

Variability of fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of a gasoline passenger car under multiple in-laboratory and on-road testing conditions

Real-world emissions and fuel consumption of gasoline and hybrid light duty vehicles under local and regulatory drive cycles

The impacts from cold start and road grade on real-world emissions and fuel consumption of gasoline, diesel and hybrid-electric light-duty passenger vehicles

Real-world Fuel Consumption and CO2 (carbon Dioxide) Emissions by Driving Conditions for Light-Duty Passenger Vehicles in China

Real-World Vehicle Emission Factors in Chinese Metropolis City - Beijing

Using a Chassis Dynamometer to Determine the Influencing Factors for the Emissions of Euro VI Vehicles

Impacts of the New Worldwide Light-Duty Test Procedure on Technology Effectiveness and China’s Passenger Vehicle Fuel Consumption Regulations

Which factor contributes more to the fuel consumption gap between in-laboratory vs. real-world driving conditions? An independent component analysis

Exhaust Emissions and Energy Consumption Analysis of Conventional, Hybrid, and Electric Vehicles in Real Driving Cycles

Gaseous and Particulate Exhaust Emissions of Hybrid and Conventional Cars over Legislative and Real Driving Cycles

Characterization of on-road CO, HC and NO emissions for petrol vehicle fleet in China city.

Real driving energy consumption and CO2 & pollutant emission characteristics of a parallel plug-in hybrid electric vehicle under different propulsion modes

Numerical study on the performance, combustion characteristics and energy flow distribution of gasoline-powered vehicle under synthetic actual driving test cycle

The WLTC vs NEDC: A Case Study on the Impacts of Driving Cycle on Engine Performance and Fuel Consumption

Real-World Fuel Efficiency and Exhaust Emissions of Light-Duty Diesel Vehicles and Their Correlation with Road Conditions

Characteristics Of Driving And On-Road Emissions Of Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles In Chinese Cities

Impact of Shortening Real Driving Emission (RDE) Test Trips on CO, NOX, and PN10 Emissions from Different Vehicles

Evaluation of real-world emissions of China V heavy-duty vehicles fueled by diesel, CNG and LNG on various road types

Simulation and Experimental Comparison of Fuel Consumption for a Heavy-duty Diesel Vehicle

Characterization of Exhaust CO, HC and NOx Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles under Real Driving Conditions