Abstract:This study proposes a clustered dynamic adaptive chemistry (CDAC) method, which uses an iterative K-means algorithm to partition the computational cells into different groups according to their similarity in terms of the temperature and significant species compositions. Taking advantage of the clustered cells, the averaged thermo-chemical properties of the cells in the respective clusters are then used to identify the adaptive dynamic reduced chemistry through the method of direct relation graph with error propagation (DRGEP). Moreover, the integration of the chemical source term, which commonly dominates the computational effort in reactive flow simulations, is now performed using the dynamic adaptive reduced chemistry at the cluster level instead of the cell level. With this CDAC method, the on-the-fly DRGEP process as well as the chemistry integration only needs to be conducted at the cluster level, dramatically reducing the unnecessary repeated computation for similar computational cells. In addition, the adaptive dynamic reduced chemistry further accelerates the chemistry integration process due to less ordinary differential equations (ODEs) to be solved for each cluster. This newly proposed CDAC method was tested in multi-dimensional homogeneous charged compression ignition engine (HCCI), direct injection compression ignition (DICI) engine and constant volume chamber combustion (CVCC) fueled with diesel, biodiesel and kerosene through the use of their respective surrogate fuel mechanisms under different operating conditions. The performance of CDAC in terms of accuracy and efficiency were extensively analyzed and discussed using different user-defined parameters, mechanisms with different surrogate components and number of species as well as different meshes with different number of grid cells. Based on this analysis, the error tolerances in DRGEP and the error tolerances of the temperature and significant species' mass fraction are recommended as: epsilon(d) <= 0.001, epsilon(T) 20K and epsilon(Y) <= 0.01 to achieve less than 0.1% integral error. With these recommended user-defined tolerances, it can be observed that the current CDAC method is able to accurately predict the in-cylinder pressure as well as the species profile in HCCI, DICI and the flame lift-off length in CVCC when compared with the full chemistry calculations as well as the experimental results. Moreover, with the recommended user defined error tolerances and a chemical kinetic model of 112 species, this CDAC method is capable of achieving a computational time speed-up factor of more than 3 compared to the conventional DAC and of almost 5 compared to the full chemistry. Finally, the CDAC method coupled CFD was applied to simulate a diesel DICI engine under three different engine speeds with a detailed primary reference fuel (PRF) mechanism of more than 1000 species. The 3-D simulation could be finished in acceptable CPU time while being able to well capture the experimental in-cylinder pressure and heat release rate for all the three engine speeds. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Numerical study on the performance, combustion characteristics and energy flow distribution of gasoline-powered vehicle under synthetic actual driving test cycle

Fuel consumption and emission performance from light-duty conventional/hybrid-electric vehicles over different cycles and real driving tests

Experiment and simulation investigation on energy management of a gasoline vehicle and hybrid turbocharger optimization based on equivalent consumption minimization strategy

Variability of fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of a gasoline passenger car under multiple in-laboratory and on-road testing conditions

Simulation and Experimental Comparison of Fuel Consumption for a Heavy-duty Diesel Vehicle

Optimization based method to develop representative driving cycle for real-world fuel consumption estimation

Experimental Research on Development Method of Urban Driving Cycle for Passenger Vehicle

Vehicle Simulation on the Test Bench

Real-world emissions and fuel consumption of gasoline and hybrid light duty vehicles under local and regulatory drive cycles

Assessment of Energy Consumption Characteristics of Ultra-Heavy-Duty Vehicles under Real Driving Conditions

Computational Acceleration of Multi-Dimensional Reactive Flow Modelling Using Diesel/biodiesel/jet-Fuel Surrogate Mechanisms Via a Clustered Dynamic Adaptive Chemistry Method

Comparing Fuel Consumption Based on Normalised Driving Behaviour: a Case Study on Major Cities in China

A Study on the Comparison of Engine Performance and Vehicle Losses of a Gasoline Vehicle in WLTC (Worldwide Harmonized Light-Duty Vehicles Test Cycles) and Artemis Rural Driving Cycles

Adaptive Energy Management Strategy Based on Intelligent Prediction of Driving Cycle for Plug−In Hybrid Electric Vehicle

The WLTC vs NEDC: A Case Study on the Impacts of Driving Cycle on Engine Performance and Fuel Consumption

Simulation analysis of electric vehicles energy consumption in driving tests

Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Integrated with Driving Cycle Prediction Method

Real-world Fuel Consumption and CO2 (carbon Dioxide) Emissions by Driving Conditions for Light-Duty Passenger Vehicles in China

Characterization of Vehicle Driving Patterns and Development of Driving Cycles in Chinese Cities

Which factor contributes more to the fuel consumption gap between in-laboratory vs. real-world driving conditions? An independent component analysis

Impacts of the New Worldwide Light-Duty Test Procedure on Technology Effectiveness and China’s Passenger Vehicle Fuel Consumption Regulations