Echo‐planar DWI variants: A comparative study in vertebral marrow pathology

Sevcihan Kesen,Nil Tokgöz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23779
2024-09-01
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
Abstract:In clinical practice, ss‐EPI imaging is rarely used to assess vertebral bone marrow signal changes, unlike other body parts, because of frequently encountered artifacts. The rs‐EPI technique is superior in the visual evaluation of the lesion with higher SNR and CNR values in pathological and normal tissue compared with the standard ss‐EPI sequence in vertebral BM imaging. In contrast to rs‐EPI, ss‐EPI is more accurate for assessing malignant benign spinal column conditions. Purpose Single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (ss‐EPI) has limited application in vertebral column imaging due to numerous artifacts. Therefore, we aimed to compare readout‐segmented echo‐planar imaging (rs‐EPI) to ss‐EPI and assess its value in the differential diagnosis of vertebral infectious, tumoral infiltrative, and degenerative disorders. Materials and Methods Sixty‐six adult patients with spondylodiscitis (SD, n = 26), tumoral infiltration (TI, n = 20), or Modic type I degeneration (DE, n = 20) findings on spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists scored images for quality on a 4‐point scale (image resolution, degree of geometric distortion, lesion selectivity, and diagnostic reliability) and measured signal intensity (SI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR). DE and SD groups also united to form the benign group. Results In all groups, rs‐EPI performed better than ss‐EPI in image quality, SNR, and CNR (p
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,acoustics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?