Cholesteatoma: multishot echo-planar vs non echo-planar diffusion-weighted MRI for the prediction of middle ear and mastoid cholesteatoma

Cristina Dudau,Ashleigh Draper,Maria Gkagkanasiou,Geoffrey Charles-Edwards,Irumee Pai,Steve Connor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20180015
2019-07-01
BJR|Open
Abstract:Objective: We aimed to compare a newer readout-segmented echoplanar imaging (RS-EPI) technique with the established single shot turbo spin echo (SS-TSE) non-EPI diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in detecting surgically validated cholesteatoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 358 consecutive MRI studies in 285 patients in which both RS-EPI and non-EPI DWI sequences were performed. Each diffusion sequence was reviewed independently and scored negative, indeterminate or positive for cholesteatoma in isolation and after reviewing the T 1 W sequence. Average artefacts scores were evaluated and the lesion size measured as a distortion indicator. The imaging scores were correlated with surgical validation, clinical and imaging follow-up. Results: There were 239 middle ear and central mastoid tract and 34 peripheral mastoid lesions. 102 tympanomastoid operations were performed. The positive predictive value ( PPV), post-operative PPV, primary PPV, negative predictive value were 93%, 95%, 87.5%, 70% for RS-EPI and 92.5%, 93.6%, 90%, 79% for non-EPI DWI. There was good agreement between the two techniques (k = 0.75). Non-EPI DWI is less susceptible to skull base artefacts although the mean cholesteatoma measurement difference was only 0.53 mm. Conclusion: RS-EPI has comparable PPV with non-EPI DWI in both primary and post-operative cholesteatoma but slightly lower negative predictive value. When there is a mismatch, non-EPI DWI better predicts the presence of cholesteatoma. There is good agreement between the sequences for cholesteatoma diagnosis. The T 1 W sequence is very important in downgrading indeterminate DWI signal lesions to a negative score. Advances in knowledge: This is, to our knowledge, the first study to compare a multishot EPI DWI technique with the established non- EPI DWI in cholesteatoma diagnosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?