Paul R Jones,Jonas Santiago,Bryon M Pearsall,Dan-My Chu,Carolyn Wolff,Aaron Kearsley
Abstract:Abstract Medication guides (MGs) provide patients with important information about certain prescription drugs to help them take these drugs safely. We surveyed US residents about their perceptions of MG readability and understandability. We randomly sampled 5204 US residents (age 18+) from Ipsos’s KnowledgePanel to complete a two-part survey. Only respondents who reported receiving an MG with their prescription drugs (n = 3852) completed part 2, which included two key items: How easy to [(1)read/(2)understand] are the MGs that you have received from a pharmacy along with your prescription medicines? (1 = Very easy, 5 = Very difficult; reverse-coded). Health literacy (HL) and demographic data were also collected. After weighting our data, we found that 85% of respondents who reported receiving an MG perceived this information as ‘very easy’ (27.3%), ‘somewhat easy’ (28.3%) or ‘about average’ (29.3%) to read. Eighty-seven percent of respondents who reported receiving an MG perceived it as ‘very easy’ (27.6%), ‘somewhat easy’ (30.2%) or ‘about average’ (29.5%) to understand. ANOVAs revealed higher average perceived MG reading and comprehension ease scores among respondents presumed to have adequate versus inadequate HL (ps ≤ 0.0006). Younger or less-educated respondents and non-Hispanic Blacks perceived MGs as easier to read and understand, on average, than their counterparts (ps ≤ 0.0001). Many of these relationships remained intact in models predicting perceived MG reading and comprehension ease (ps ≤ 0.001). Adjusted R2 values across models were small, however (≤0.06). Our findings suggest most US residents (18+) who received MGs perceived them to be ‘about average’ to ‘very easy’ to read and understand.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the difficulty level of American adults in reading and understanding Medication Guides (MGs), and to explore whether these perceptions vary according to Health Literacy (HL) levels and demographic characteristics (such as age, education level, race/ethnicity, etc.). Specifically, the researchers hope to understand through this survey:
1. **Readability and comprehensibility of MGs**: How easy do most American adults who receive MGs think these guides are to read and understand.
2. **Differences among different groups**: Whether there are significant differences in the perception of reading and understanding MGs among groups with different health literacy levels and demographic characteristics.
3. **Analysis of influencing factors**: Which factors (such as age, education level, income, health literacy, etc.) have a significant impact on the difficulty level of reading and understanding MGs.
### Research background
Medication Guides (MGs) are paper - based manuals approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), aiming to provide patients with important information about certain prescription drugs to help them use these drugs safely. However, previous research results show that there is great uncertainty about whether patients can read or understand these guides, and these results may not be generalized to all American adults. Therefore, this study aims to clarify the current readability and comprehensibility of MGs through a national representative sample survey, and to explore their relationship with health literacy and demographic characteristics.
### Research methods
The researchers randomly selected 5,204 US residents (aged 18 and above) from Ipsos's KnowledgePanel to conduct a two - part online survey. Only those respondents who reported having received MGs (n = 3,852) completed the second part of the survey, which included two key questions: How easy was the MG you received to read and understand (1 = very easy, 5 = very difficult; reverse - coded). In addition, the health literacy and demographic data of the respondents were also collected.
### Main findings
1. **Overall perception**: 85% of the respondents thought that MGs were "very easy", "relatively easy" or "so - so" to read; 87% of the respondents thought that MGs were "very easy", "relatively easy" or "so - so" to understand.
2. **Impact of health literacy**: Respondents with higher health literacy were more likely to think that MGs were easy to read and understand than those with insufficient health literacy (p ≤ 0.0006).
3. **Impact of demographic characteristics**:
- Young people (aged 18 - 44) and non - Hispanic blacks were more likely to think that MGs were easy to read and understand than other groups (p ≤ 0.0001).
- Respondents with lower education levels and lower incomes were more likely to think that MGs were easy to read than those with higher education levels and higher incomes (p < 0.0001).
### Conclusion
The research results show that most American adults who receive MGs think that these guides are "so - so" to "very easy" to read and understand. However, there are significant differences in the reading and understanding of MGs among groups with different health literacy levels and demographic characteristics. These findings are helpful for improving the design and distribution strategies of MGs to better meet the needs of different patients.
### Formula summary
The statistical analyses involved in this paper mainly use ANOVA, t - test and χ² - test, as well as weighted stratified multiple linear regression models. For example:
- ANOVA was used to compare the differences in the difficulty level of reading and understanding MGs among different health literacy level groups:
\[
F(2, 3835)=44.05, \quad p < 0.0001
\]
\[
F(2, 3830)=77.61, \quad p < 0.0001
\]
- The weighted stratified multiple linear regression model was used to predict the difficulty level of reading and understanding MGs:
\[
\text{Adjusted }R^{2}=0.06, \quad F(6, 3831)=43.19, \quad p < 0.0001
\]
\[
\text{Adjusted }R^{2}=0.06, \quad F(6, 3826)=43.85, \quad p < 0.0001