Patients' Experiences and Preferences for Medicine Information: An International Comparison Between Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and England
Pitchaya Nualdaisri,Sarah A Corlett,Immaculate Akaso,Barbra Katusiime,Freddy Eric Kitutu,Siew Siang Chua,Janet Krska
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s444891
2024-01-23
Patient Preference and Adherence
Abstract:Pitchaya Nualdaisri, 1, 2 Sarah A Corlett, 2, 3 Immaculate Akaso, 4 Barbra Katusiime, 5 Freddy Eric Kitutu, 4 Siew Siang Chua, 6 Janet Krska 2 1 Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand; 2 Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Kent and Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent, UK; 3 Pharmacy Department, Medway Foundation NHS Trust, Kent, UK; 4 Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; 5 School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, London, UK; 6 School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia Correspondence: Pitchaya Nualdaisri, Email Background: Verbal and written medicine information are available to the public but the quality, ease of access, ease of understanding and use of these resources varies greatly between countries. Timely access to quality medicine information is essential to support patient safety. Objective: This international cross-sectional survey, conducted in low-to high-income countries, aimed to compare experiences of and preferences for medicine information sources among respondents with recent medicine use. Methods: The survey was originally developed in England (Kent), then adapted and translated for use in southern Thailand (Songkhla), Malaysia (Klang Valley), and central Uganda (Kampala). Data were analysed using simple descriptive statistics and Chi-squared tests. Results: A total 1588 respondents were involved in the study. Community pharmacies were the primary source of medicines in all four countries (40.7 to 65.3%). Most respondents (1460; 92%) had received at least one form of information with their medicine, but provision of written medicine information (WMI) varied between countries. A manufacturer's leaflet was the most frequent information source for patients in England, while verbal information was common in Thailand, Malaysia and Uganda. There was commonality across countries in the desire for verbal information with or without WMI (1330; 84.8%); aspects of medicine information wanted most frequently were instructions on medicine use (98.3%), indication (98.2%), name (94.4%) and possible side effects (94.3%); and the importance of providing leaflets with all medicines (87.5%). Fewer than 10% in Uganda would use internet based WMI, compared to between 20% and 55% elsewhere. Conclusion: Preferences for medicine information are similar across countries: verbal information is seen as most desirable, and the most wanted aspects of information are common internationally. Accessibility and understandability are key influences on preferred information sources. In-country regulations and practices should ensure that all medicine users can access the information necessary to maximise safe medicine use. Keywords: medicine information sources, patient information leaflets, patient preference, cross-country comparison, international survey Providing accurate information about medicines is crucial for ensuring patient safety. 1 Globally, different sources of medicine information are available in multiple formats. 2 In the UK and Europe, a leaflet is regularly provided with all medicines, following European regulations. 3 Verbal information from health professionals also plays an important role in informing people about medicines, as well as explaining and encouraging reading of written information. 1,4 Other sources include health-related websites, television, advertisements, advice from family and friends, which may offer conflicting, inaccurate, poorly written, or non-evidence-based information. 5 Patient preferences for sources of medicine information differ depending on age, sex, ethnic and cultural background, health and general literacy, duration of medicine use and experiences. 6 A 2007 systematic review on the role and value of written medicine information (WMI) called for more research into the content, layout and delivery of WMI, particularly patient information leaflets (PILs), and Internet-based information. 7 As available medicines information has increased world-wide, there is also greater variety in the studies investigating patients' views and experiences. However, our scoping review identified only six surveys of medicine users from African and 25 from Asian countries. 2 Therefore, studies are still needed in many low and middle-income countries to confirm needs and preferences, While surveys are reported more frequently from high-income -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal