Abstract:ABSTRACT Clinically validated human papillomavirus (HPV) assays are crucial in cervical cancer screening. In this study, we evaluated the Allplex HPV HR Detection assay (Seegene, SouthKorea) for its clinical accuracy and reproducibility according to the international criteria, using the RealTime High Risk HPV m2000 assay (Abbott, USA) as standard comparator. The Allplex HPV HR assay exhibits significant non-inferior sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade (CIN) 2 or worse (CIN2+) with a ratio of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97–1.03, P = 0.006), insignificant non-inferior sensitivity to detect CIN3+ with a ratio of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.88–1.13, P = 0.098), and non-inferior specificity to exclude CIN2+ with a ratio of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99–1.00, P < 0.001) compared to the standard comparator. In addition, the assay shows an excellent reproducibility within the same laboratory [96.5% (95% CI: 94.6–97.9) with a kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87–0.95)] and between laboratories [96.7% (95% CI: 94.8–98.0) with a kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87–0.95)] for overall high-risk HPV positivity as well as for each individual HPV type. Pooling our study data with those of another independent study supports the consistency of our findings. We conclude that both the clinical accuracy to detect cervical precancer and the reproducibility of Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfill the international validation criteria of use in cervical cancer screening. IMPORTANCE The clinical validation of human papillomavirus (HPV) assays in accordance with well-established international guidelines is crucial to ensure that only validated assays are used in the context of screening (Meijer et al., Int J Cancer, 2009). The guidelines, developed by an international consortium, require that a novel HPV assay has non-inferior accuracy against a standard comparator test for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade (CIN) 2 or worse (CIN2+). Additionally, a new HPV assay should meet specific criteria for both intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility to ensure the assay consistently exhibits technical precision and robust performance. Pooling our study data with those of another independent study supports the consistency of our findings. In conclusion, both the clinical accuracy to detect cervical precancer and the reproducibility of Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfill the international validation criteria of use in cervical cancer screening.

Comparison of high-risk HPV detection by the AmpFire® HPV Screening 16/18/HR technique (Atila Biosystems) and the hybrid capture 2 test (Qiagen)

AmpFire HPV and ScreenFire RS HPV validation trial

Clinical Significance of Genotyping for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 18/45 Combined with Cytology in Cervical Exfoliated Cells in HPV Oncogenic Mrna-Positive Women

Intra‐ and interlaboratory reproducibility evaluation toward international validation status of the AmpFire assay

Performance evaluation of the Allplex HPV HR Detection assay in comparison with the Cobas HPV test for high-risk HPV genotyping

Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfils all clinical performance and reproducibility validation requirements for primary cervical cancer screening

Evaluation of the Allplex HPV assay's adherence to international guidelines for cervical cancer screening in clinician-collected samples

Simultaneous Detection And Differentiation Of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes 6, 11, 16 And 18 By Allglo Quadruplex Quantitative Pcr

Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data

Performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) mRNA testing and HPV 16 and 18/45 genotyping combined with age stratification in the triaging of women with ASC-US cytology

A Direct Comparison of Four High‐risk Human Papillomavirus Tests Versus the Cobas Test: Detecting CIN2+ in Low‐resource Settings

Performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) mRNA testing and HPV 16 and 18/45 genotyping combined with age stratification in the triaging of women with ASC-US cytology.

Head-to-head comparison of genotyping of human papillomavirus by real-time multiplex PCR assay using type-specific primers and SPF10-PCR-based line probe assay

Human Papillomavirus Messenger RNA Assay for Cervical Cancer Screening: the Shenzhen Cervical Cancer Screening Trial I.

A Direct Comparison of Four High Risk Human Papilloma Virus Tests Versus the Cobas Test for Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer

Analytic performance of ScreenFire HPV RS assay Zebra BioDome format and its potential for large-scale population HPV screening

Evaluation of an isothermal amplification HPV detection assay for primary cervical cancer screening

Analytical evaluation of the automated genotyping system (GenPlex) compared to a traditional real‐time PCR assay for the detection of high‐risk human papillomaviruses

Head-to-head comparison of 7 high-sensitive human papillomavirus nucleic acid detection technologies with the SPF10 LiPA-25 system

Comparative evaluation of Anyplex II HPV28 and Allplex HPV28 molecular assays for human papillomavirus detection and genotyping in anogenital cancer screening

Comparison of real-time multiplex human papillomavirus (HPV) PCR assays with the linear array HPV genotyping PCR assay and influence of DNA extraction method on HPV detection