Analytical evaluation of the automated genotyping system (GenPlex) compared to a traditional real‐time PCR assay for the detection of high‐risk human papillomaviruses

Lijuan Zhang,Yan Ju,Haixu Hu,Chunhui Ma,Yanju Yu,Yan Huang,Lili Gong,Wei Zhao,Yujia Liu,Yi Liu,Lihong Bian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.29496
IF: 20.693
2024-02-27
Journal of Medical Virology
Abstract:The detection of high‐risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) is crucial for early screening and preventing cervical cancer. However, the substantial workload in high‐level hospitals or the limited resources in primary‐level hospitals hinder widespread testing. To address this issue, we explored a sample‐to‐answer genotyping system and assessed its performance by comparing it with the traditional real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method conducted manually. Samples randomly selected from those undergoing routine real‐time PCR detection were re‐analyzed using the fully automatic GenPlex® system. This system identifies 24 types of HPV through a combination of ordinary PCR and microarray‐based reverse hybridization. Inconsistent results were confirmed by repeated testing with both methods, and the κ concordance test was employed to evaluate differences between the two methods. A total of 365 samples were randomly selected from 7259 women. According to real‐time PCR results, 76 were high‐risk HPV negative, and 289 were positive. The GenPlex® system achieved a κ value greater than 0.9 (ranging from 0.920 to 1.000, p
virology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?