Abstract:Purpose This study aims to assess National Health Service (NHS) decision-making protocols during the pandemic, with two primary objectives: (1) to establish whether decision-making protocols changed during the pandemic and (2) to evaluate if these changes could inform future decision-making strategies beyond the pandemic. By focusing on the shift from traditional to emergency decision-making processes, this research seeks to derive actionable insights for enhancing policy and practice in crisis conditions. Design/methodology/approach We employ a mixed-methods approach, gathering data through an online survey targeted at senior NHS decision-makers involved in the pandemic response. Our survey collected quantitative and qualitative data to assess changes in decision-making protocols. The analysis included statistical techniques to quantify changes and thematic analysis to explore their implications, providing a detailed understanding of decision-making adaptations during the crisis and their potential future impact. Findings Our findings clarify the role of the NHS values and constitution, which prioritize patient welfare, dignity and equitable access to healthcare, guiding all decision-making. During the pandemic, the urgency to respond swiftly necessitated modifications to these guiding principles. Traditional processes were adapted, allowing for more rapid decision-making while still aligning with the core values, effectively balancing immediate response needs with long-term healthcare commitments. Research limitations/implications Our research contributes to decision-making under crisis conditions within a healthcare context and brings together a theoretical background which has accommodated the development of models and approaches that can be utilized by both service and manufacturing organizations. In addition, we have sought to bring together the importance of decision-making protocols under crisis conditions using observations from respondents who experienced decision-making at a senior level prior, during and beyond the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has assisted in the models developed in this paper. In addition, our empirical research demonstrates the importance that the values of the organization have upon decision-making and how such values need to be adjusted in the light of crisis operations. Practical implications Our research provides insightful observations relating to the pressures upon decision-making protocols under crisis conditions and provides senior decision-makers with an approach to realigning values to cope with unusual and highly pressurized operating environments. Notably, there is a clear requirement for decision-makers to communicate clearly to staff the need to temporarily alter the modus operandi to reflect crisis operations. Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to explore decision-making in the NHS during a pandemic and to clearly demonstrate how such decision-making needs to be adapted to reflect the nature and scope of delivering a complex healthcare service under crisis conditions.

Public Relations in a Crisis Decision-Making Kaleidoscope

Crisis, Culture, Leader and Interaction History: Contextual Effects on Unethical Prosocial Behavior

Decision-making under crisis: insights from the health service sector

Strategic leadership in organizational crises: A review and research agenda

Public Relations and Social Media for Effective Crisis Communication Management

Difficult Times, Difficult Decisions: Examining the Impact of Perceived Crisis Response Strategies During COVID-19

Decision-making in crisis situations

Management in times of crisis: Can collective plans prepare teams to make and implement good decisions?

Healthcare Decision-Making in a Crisis: A Qualitative Systemic Review Protocol

The role of empathy in organizational communication during times of crisis

Leader as performer; leader as human: A discursive and retrospective construction of crisis leadership

Public relations as relationship management : a relational approach to the study and practice of public relations

Activating constructive employee behavioural responses in a crisis: Examining the effects of pre‐crisis reputation and crisis communication strategies on employee voice behaviours

Identifying challenges to critical incident decision-making through a macro-, meso-, and micro- lens: A systematic synthesis and holistic narrative analysis

From relationship management to change empowerment: shifting public relations theory to prioritize publics

When Things Go Wrong: Account Strategy Following a Corporate Crisis Event

Anticipatory foresight and adaptive decision-making as a crucial characteristic for business continuity, crisis and emergency leadership.

Organizing for Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy

Unearthing the Facets of Crisis History in Crisis Communication: A Conceptual Framework and Introduction of the Crisis History Salience Scale

Effective decision-making in public health organizations: reference to the COVID-19 pandemic

Public Relations and Diplomacy in a Globalized World: An Issue of Public Communication