Organizing for Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy

Tom Christensen,Per Lægreid,Lise H. Rykkja,Per Laegreid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12558
IF: 8.144
2016-04-17
Public Administration Review
Abstract:What makes a well‐functioning governmental crisis management system, and how can this be studied using an organization theory–based approach? A core argument is that such a system needs both governance capacity and governance legitimacy. Organizational arrangements as well as the legitimacy of government authorities will affect crisis management performance. A central argument is that both structural features and cultural context matter, as does the nature of the crisis. Is it a transboundary crisis? How unique is it, and how much uncertainty is associated with it? The arguments are substantiated with empirical examples and supported by a literature synthesis, focusing on public administration research. A main conclusion is that there is no optimal formula for harmonizing competing interests and tensions or for overcoming uncertainty and ambiguous government structures. Flexibility and adaptation are key assets, which are constrained by the political, administrative, and situational context. Furthermore, a future research agenda is indicated. Related Content: Perry (PAR November/December 2016)
public administration
What problem does this paper attempt to address?