Abstract:There have been recent arguments against the idea that substructural solutions are uniform. The claim is that even if the substructuralist solves the common semantic paradoxes uniformly by targeting Cut or Contraction, with additional machinery, we can construct higher-level paradoxes (e.g., a higher-level Liar, a higher-level Curry, and a meta-validity Curry). These higher-level paradoxes do not use metainferential Cut or Contraction, but rather, higher-level Cuts and higher-level Contractions. These kinds of paradoxes suggest that targeting Cut or Contraction is not enough for solving semantic paradoxes; the substructuralist must target Cut of every level or Contraction of every level to solve the paradoxes. Hence, the substructuralists do not provide as uniform of a solution as they hoped they did. In response, we argue that the substructuralists need not admit these additional machineries. In fact, they are redundant in light of the validity predicate (i.e., there is no gain in terms of expressive power). The validity predicate is powerful enough to creep these paradoxes in the object level. The substructuralist does not need to ascend to metainferences to construct higher-level paradoxes. Moreover, there is a reading available to the substructuralist such that all the higher-level structural rules would collapse to instances of the object-level structural rules (e.g., meta Cut and meta Contraction would become instances of Cut and Contraction). We then address Barrio et al.'s worry that the validity predicate has its shortcomings; the substructuralist cannot internalize some of its metarules. We claim that the validity of metarules can be internalized without the need to strengthen the validity predicate. However, a problem raised by Barrio et al. is still present—the problem of internalizing unwanted instances of Cut in Cut-free approaches. We argue that this internalization problem is not unique to the validity predicate; the same problem is present with other problematic predicates, such as the truth predicate and the provability predicate.

(Re-)Reading Sklar (1959)—A Personal View on Sklar's Theorem

Copula modeling for discrete random vectors

Copulas in Hilbert spaces

On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method.

Sahlqvist via Translation

On Semantic Paradoxes from the Perspective of Substructural Logics

Higher-Level Paradoxes and Substructural Solutions

Two Relations in Translation——Rethinking of the Skopostheory

The Many Faces of the Subspace Theorem (after Adamczewski, Bugeaud, Corvaja, Zannier...)

Meaning and interpretation: The semiotic similarities and differences between Cognitive Grammar and European structural linguistics

Some Reflections on the Set-based and the Conditional-based Interpretations of Statements in Syllogistic Reasoning

Counterfactual Analysis by Algorithmic Complexity: A metric between possible worlds

Copredication and Meaning Transfer

Translation Strategies of The Strange Days Under Skopos Theory

A note on the Declarative reading(s) of Logic Programming

Skopos, Commission and Translational Action: On Reading of Hans J Vermeer's Skopos and Commission in Translational Action

On the methodology of informal rigour: set theory, semantics, and intuitionism

Analytical Truths in R. Carnap’s Theory and in Natural Language

On synthesizing Skolem functions for first order logic formulae

On Various Negative Translations

Some proof theoretical remarks on quantification in ordinary language