Abstract:Epistemic modals have peculiar logical features that are challenging to account for in a broadly classical framework. For instance, while a sentence of the form $p\wedge\Diamond\neg p$ ('$p$, but it might be that not $p$') appears to be a contradiction, $\Diamond\neg p$ does not entail $\neg p$, which would follow in classical logic. Likewise, the classical laws of distributivity and disjunctive syllogism fail for epistemic modals. Existing attempts to account for these facts generally either under- or over-correct. Some predict that $p\wedge\Diamond\neg p$, a so-called epistemic contradiction, is a contradiction only in an etiolated sense, under a notion of entailment that does not always allow us to replace $p\wedge\Diamond\neg p$ with a contradiction; these theories underpredict the infelicity of embedded epistemic contradictions. Other theories savage classical logic, eliminating not just rules that intuitively fail but also rules like non-contradiction, excluded middle, De Morgan's laws, and disjunction introduction, which intuitively remain valid for epistemic modals. In this paper, we aim for a middle ground, developing a semantics and logic for epistemic modals that makes epistemic contradictions genuine contradictions and that invalidates distributivity and disjunctive syllogism but that otherwise preserves classical laws that intuitively remain valid. We start with an algebraic semantics, based on ortholattices instead of Boolean algebras, and then propose a more concrete possibility semantics, based on partial possibilities related by compatibility. Both semantics yield the same consequence relation, which we axiomatize. We then show how to lift an arbitrary possible worlds model for a non-modal language to a possibility model for a language with epistemic modals.

A note on the Declarative reading(s) of Logic Programming

On the Correspondence of Non-flat Assumption-based Argumentation and Logic Programming with Negation as Failure in the Head

Defeasible deontic logic: arguing about permission and obligation

The Logic of Logic Programming

Logic programming with default, weak and strict negations

Three-valued and four-valued approach to logic programming with negation

Logic As Programming

Interdefinability of defeasible logic and logic programming under the well-founded semantics

Language Heedless of Logic - Philosophy Mindful of What? Failures of Distributive and Absorption Laws

Further remarks on the dual negation in team logics

A Survey of the Proof-Theoretic Foundations of Logic Programming

Bottom-up Evaluation of Datalog with Negation

Modal Foundations for Predicate Logic.

Programming in logic without logic programming

The Orthologic of Epistemic Modals

Where Fail-Safe Default Logics Fail

Predicate Logic as a Modelling Language: The IDP System

Finite-Choice Logic Programming

Implicit and Explicit Stances in Logic

Non-standard modalities in paraconsistent Gödel logic

Declarative Diagnosis of Floundering