Abstract:Main text This supplementary comparison was about the calibration of platinum resistance thermometers in the range of -70 °C to 250 °C. Four laboratories participated in the comparison: Emirates Metrology Institute (EMI) from United Arab Emirates, SASO-NMCC from Saudi Arabia, QGOSM from Qatar and Tubitak UME from Türkiye. These Institutes are full or associated (Tubitak UME) members of the GULFMET Regional Metrology Organization. The pilot institute was Emirates Metrology Institute, who also provided the two transfer platinum resistance thermometers and monitor their stability during the comparison. The measurements of the comparison were performed between April 2019 and February 2021 and the circulation of the instruments was without problems, except for a delay of four months between the laboratories QGOSM and EMI due to the Coronavirus pandemic. The weighted mean of the measurements from all laboratories was used to produce the W ratios and R 0.01 reference values of the thermometers and no laboratory was excluded from this weighted mean. Note that this comparison is an RMO supplementary comparison, so the weighted mean values generated are used only as a baseline for reporting the results, and they have no particular meaning of reference values in the sense of the key comparisons. The results show a satisfactory agreement between the participating laboratories (|E n | <1), except for two set-points: -35 °C and 100 °C, for one of the two transfer thermometers, for one of the laboratories. Combined expanded uncertainties for R 0.01 were equivalent to about 0.004 °C for the laboratories using water triple point cells as a reference, and 0.010 °C for QGOSM laboratory using ice point as reference. For the other measurement points, R values, were having equivalent combined expanded uncertainties ranging from 0.0060 °C to 0.010 °C for UME, 0.008 °C to 0.016 °C for EMI, 0.012 °C to 0.024 °C for SASO-NMCC and 0.014 °C to 0.054 °C for QGOSM. The mentioned uncertainties refer to the most stable of the transfer thermometers used in the comparison. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCT, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Bilateral comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V standards between SASO-NMCC (Saudi Arabia) and the BIPM, September to November 2023 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b)

Bilateral comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V standards between INRIM (Italy) and the BIPM, November to December 2023 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b)

Bilateral Comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V Standards Between the KRISS (republic of Korea) and the BIPM, February 2008 (part of the Ongoing BIPM Key Comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and B)

Supplementary comparison on a platinum resistance thermometer calibration from -70 °C to 250 °C

AFRIMETS.EM-S2: comparison on digital multimeter for DC voltage, DC current, DC resistance, AC voltage and AC current parameters

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with NMC-A*STAR, July 2022

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with VSL, April 2024

Final report, On-going Key Comparison BIPM.QM-K1, Ozone at ambient level, comparison with INRIM, February 2022

Supplementary comparisons of DC high voltage measuring reference instruments COOMET 449Ru-a08 (COOMET_EM-S7)

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with CMS/ITRI, March 2024

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with NIM, Oct 2023

Comparison of the Josephson voltage standards of the NIM (China) and the BIPM

COOMET key comparison COOMET.PR-K1.a.2018 for spectral irradiance 250 nm to 2500 nmm, final report

APMP key comparison of AC-DC current transfer standards: final report

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with NPL, June 2022

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with EMPA, June 2023

Final Report on APMP.QM-K18.2016 Key Comparison on Ph Measurement of Carbonate Buffer

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K5 of the air-kerma standards of the CIEMAT, Spain and the BIPM in 137 Cs gamma radiation

Supplementary comparisons of reference measuring systems of electric capacitance and loss dissipation factor on AC high voltage of power frequency COOMET 604/RU-a/13 (COOMET.EM-S18)

Supplementary comparison of national measurement standards of gauge pressure in the range from 1 MPa to 10 MPa

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K5 of the air-kerma standards of the BEV, Austria and the BIPM in 137 Cs gamma radiation