Learning effects in over-ground running gait retraining: A six-month follow-up of a quasi-randomized controlled trial

Pieter Van den Berghe,Rud Derie,Joeri Gerlo,Senne Bonnaerens,Pieter Fiers,Ine Van Caekenberghe,Dirk De Clercq,Veerle Segers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2323849

IF: 3.9428

2024-04-29

Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract:This study evaluated learning and recall effects following a feedback-based retraining program. A 6-month follow-up of a quasi-randomized controlled trial was performed with and without recall. Twenty runners were assigned to experimental or control groups and completed a 3-week running program. A body-worn system collected axial tibial acceleration and provided real-time feedback on peak tibial acceleration for six running sessions in an athletic training facility. The experimental group received music-based biofeedback in a faded feedback scheme. The controls received tempo-synchronized music as a placebo for blinding purposes. The peak tibial acceleration and vertical loading rate of the ground reaction force were determined in a lab at baseline and six months following the intervention to assess retention and recall. The impacts of the experimental group substantially decreased at follow-up following a simple verbal recall (i.e., run as at the end of the program): peak tibial acceleration:-32%, p = 0.018; vertical loading rate:-34%, p = 0.006. No statistically significant changes were found regarding the retention of the impact variables. The impact magnitudes did not change over time in the control group. The biofeedback-based intervention did not induce clear learning at follow-up, however, a substantial impact reduction was recallable through simple cueing in the absence of biofeedback.

sport sciences