Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Running technique and running speed are considered important risk factors for running injuries. Real-time feedback on running technique and running speed by wearables may help reduce injury risk.Purpose:To investigate whether real-time feedback on spatiotemporal metrics and relative speed by commercially available pressure-sensitive insoles would reduce running injuries and improve running performance compared with no real-time feedback.Study Design:Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:A total of 220 recreational runners were randomly assigned into the intervention and control groups. Both groups received pressure-sensitive insoles, but only the intervention group received real-time feedback on spatiotemporal metrics and relative speed. The feedback aimed to reduce loading on the joint/segment estimated to exhibit the highest load. Injury rates were compared between the groups using Cox regressions. Secondary outcomes compared included injury severity, the proportion of runners with multiple injuries, changes in self-reported personal best times and motivation (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire–2), and interest in continuing wearable use after study completion.Results:A total of 160 participants (73%) were included in analyses of the primary outcome. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in injury rate between the groups (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; P = .70). This was expected, as 53 of 160 (33%) participants ended up in the unassigned group because they used incorrect wearable settings, nullifying any interventional effects. As-treated analysis showed a significantly lower injury rate among participants receiving real-time feedback (HR, 0.53; P = .03). Similarly, the first-time injury severity was significantly lower (–0.43; P = .042). Per-protocol analysis showed no significant differences in injury rates, but the direction favored the intervention group (HR, 0.67; P = .30). There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients with multiple injuries (HR, 0.82; P = .40) or changes in running performance (3.07%; P = .26) and motivation. Also, ~60% of the participants who completed the study showed interest in continuing wearable use.Conclusion:Real-time feedback on spatiotemporal metrics and relative speed provided by commercially available instrumented insoles may reduce the rate and severity of injuries in recreational runners. Feedback did not influence running performance and exercise motivation.Registration:NL8472 (Dutch Trial Register).

Immediate Effects of Real-Time Feedback During Overground Gait Performed Using Inertial Measurement Units on Gait Parameters in Healthy Young Participants: A Cross-Sectional Study

Inertial measurement unit-based real-time feedback gait immediately changes gait parameters in older inpatients: a pilot study

Feasibility of Wearable Haptic Biofeedback Training for Reducing the Knee Abduction Moment During Overground Walking

Trainer in a pocket - proof-of-concept of mobile, real-time, foot kinematics feedback for gait pattern normalization in individuals after stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury and elderly patients

Primary and secondary effects of real-time feedback to reduce vertical loading rate during running

Immediate effect of individual bars of insoles and their combination on gait parameters in asymptomatic healthy adults

Real-time feedback of dynamic foot pressure index for gait training of toe-walking children with spastic diplegia.

Configurable, wearable sensing and vibrotactile feedback system for real-time postural balance and gait training: proof-of-concept

A Practical Gait Feedback Method Based on Wearable Inertial Sensors for a Drop Foot Assistance Device

Visualization of walking speed variation-induced synchronized dynamic changes in lower limb joint angles and activity of trunk and lower limb muscles with a newly developed gait analysis system

Real-Time Knee Adduction Moment Feedback for Gait Retraining Through Visual and Tactile Displays

Differences in kinematic parameters during gait between the patients with knee osteoarthritis and healthy controls using an insole with a single inertial measurement unit: A case-control study

The Effect of Wearable-Based Real-Time Feedback on Running Injuries and Running Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Estimation of Foot Trajectory for Clinical Gait Analysis

IMU-Based Kinematics Estimation Accuracy Affects Gait Retraining Using Vibrotactile Cues

The Effects of Corrective Exercise With and Without Visual Feedback on Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Dynamic Balance in Adolescent Female Athletes With Dynamic Knee Valgus: A Pilot Study

Effect of sensor number and location on accelerometry-based vertical ground reaction force estimation during walking

Effects of gait training with auditory biofeedback on biomechanics and talar cartilage characteristics in individuals with chronic ankle instability: A randomized controlled trial

Can real-time visual feedback during gait retraining reduce metabolic demand for individuals with transtibial amputation?

The effect of stride length on lower extremity joint kinetics at various gait speeds

The effect of adding real-time postural feedback in balance and mobility training in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis