Abstract:Low-cost optical particle sensors have the potential to supplement existing particulate matter (PM) monitoring systems and to provide high spatial and temporal resolutions. However, low-cost PM sensors have often shown questionable performance under various ambient conditions. Temperature, relative humidity (RH), and particle composition have been identified as factors that directly affect the performance of low-cost PM sensors. This study investigated whether NO 2 , which creates PM 2.5 by means of chemical reactions in the atmosphere, can be used to improve the calibration performance of low-cost PM 2.5 sensors. To this end, we evaluated the PurpleAir PA-II, called PA-II, a popular air monitoring system that utilizes two low-cost PM sensors and that is frequently deployed near air quality monitoring sites of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). We selected a single location where 14 PA-II units have operated for more than 2 years, since July 2017. Based on the operating periods of the PA-II units, we then chose the period of January 2018 to December 2019 for study. Among the 14 units, a single unit containing more than 23 months of measurement data with a high correlation between the unit's two PMS sensors was selected for analysis. Daily and hourly PM 2.5 measurement data from the PA-II unit and a BAM 1020 instrument, respectively, were compared using the federal reference method (FRM), and a per-month analysis was conducted against the BAM-1020 using hourly PM 2.5 data. In the per-month analysis, three key features – namely temperature, relative humidity (RH), and NO 2 – were considered. The NO 2 , called collocated NO 2 , was collected from the reliable instrument collocated with the PA-II unit. The per-month analysis showed that the PA-II unit had a good correlation (coefficient of determination R 2 >0.819 ) with the BAM-1020 during the months of November, December, and January in both 2018 and 2019, but their correlation intensity was moderate during other months, such as in July and September 2018 and August, September, and October 2019. NO 2 was shown to be a key factor in increasing the value of R 2 in the months when moderate correlation based on only PM 2.5 was achieved. This study calibrated a PA-II unit using multiple linear regression (MLR) and random forest (RF) methods based on the same three features used in the analysis studies, as well as their multiplicative terms. The addition of NO 2 had a much larger effect than that of RH when both PM 2.5 and temperature were considered for calibration in both models. When NO 2 , temperature, and relative humidity were considered, the MLR method achieved similar calibration performance to the RF method. In addressing the feasibility of utilizing distant NO 2 measurements for calibration in lieu of collocated data, the study highlights the effectiveness of distant NO 2 when correlated strongly with collocated measurements. This finding offers a practical solution for situations where obtaining collocated NO 2 data proves to be challenging or costly. We assessed the performance of different PA-II units to determine their efficacy. Our investigation reveals a significant enhancement in calibration performance across different PA-II units upon integrating NO 2 . Importantly, this improvement remains consistent even when employing models trained with different PA-II units within the same location. Overall, this investigation emphasizes the significance of NO 2 in improving calibration for low-cost PM 2.5 sensors and presents insights into leveraging distant NO 2 measurements as a viable alternative for calibration in the absence of collocated data.

Transferability of ML-based Global Calibration Models for NO2 and NO Low-Cost Sensors

Calibrating Low-Cost Sensors by a Two-Phase Learning Approach for Urban Air Quality Measurement

Leveraging machine learning algorithms to advance low-cost air sensor calibration in stationary and mobile settings

Calibration and Inter-Unit Consistency Assessment of an Electrochemical Sensor System Using Machine Learning

High-performance machine-learning-based calibration of low-cost nitrogen dioxide sensor using environmental parameter differentials and global data scaling

Calibrations of Low-Cost Air Pollution Monitoring Sensors for CO, NO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub>

Calibration of Integrated Low-Cost Environmental Sensors Based on Machine Learning with Multiple Scenes

Statistical data pre-processing and time series incorporation for high-efficacy calibration of low-cost NO2 sensor using machine learning

On Memory-Based Precise Calibration of Cost-Efficient NO 2 Sensor Using Artificial Intelligence and Global Response Correction

Hierarchical network design for nitrogen dioxide measurement in urban environments, part 2: network-based sensor calibration

Evaluation of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Calibration Models

Application of Machine Learning Techniques for the Calibration of Low-cost IoT Sensors in Environmental Monitoring Networks.

A Global Multi-Unit Calibration as a Method for Large Scale IoT Particulate Matter Monitoring Systems Deployments

Calibration of CO, NO2, and O3 Using Airify: A Low-Cost Sensor Cluster for Air Quality Monitoring

Few-shot calibration of low-cost air pollution (PM2.5) sensors using meta-learning

Calibrating networks of low-cost air quality sensors

Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration: A Survey and Critical Analysis

Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM 2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance

Development and Evaluation of a Robust Temperature Sensitive Algorithm for Long Term NO2 Gas Sensor Network Data Correction

Evaluation of calibration performance of a low-cost particulate matter sensor using collocated and distant NO2

Calibration of NO, SO2, and PM using airify: A low-cost sensor cluster for air quality monitoring