Abstract:It is essential to accurately assess and verify the effects of air pollution on human health and the environment in order to develop effective mitigation strategies. More accurate analysis of air pollution can be achieved by utilizing a higherdensity sensor network. In recent studies, the implementation of low-cost sensors has demonstrated their capability to quantify air pollution at a high spatial resolution, alleviating the problem of coarse spatial measurements associated with conventional monitoring stations. However, the reliability of such sensors is in question due to concerns about the quality and accuracy of their data. In response to these concerns, active research efforts have focused on leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques in the calibration process of low-cost sensors. These efforts demonstrate promising results for automatic calibration, which would significantly reduce the efforts and costs of traditional calibration methods and boost the low-cost sensors' performance. As a contribution to this promising research field, this study aims to investigate the calibration transferability between identical low-cost sensor units (SUs) for NO 2 and NO using ML-based global models. Global models would further reduce calibration efforts and costs by eliminating the need for individual calibrations, especially when utilizing networks of tens or hundreds of low-cost sensors. This study employed a dataset acquired from four SUs that were located across three distinct locations within Switzerland. We also propose utilizing O 3 measurements obtained from available nearby reference stations to address the cross-sensitivity effect. This strategy aims to enhance model accuracy as most electrochemical NO 2 and NO sensors are extremely cross-sensitive to O 3 . The results of this study show excellent calibration transferability between SUs located at the same site (Case A), with the average model performance being of R 2 = 0.90 ± 0.05 and RMSE = 3.4 ± 0.9 ppb for NO 2 , and R 2 = 0.97 ± 0.02 and RMSE = 3.1 ± 0.8 ppb for NO. There is also relatively good transferability between SUs deployed at different sites (Case B), with the average performance for NO 2 being R 2 = 0.65 ± 0.08 and RMSE = 5.5 ± 0.4 ppb, and R 2 = 0.82 ± 0.05 and RMSE = 5.8 ± 0.8 ppb for NO. Interestingly, the results illustrate a substantial improvement in the calibration models when integrating O 3 measurements, which is more pronounced when SUs are situated in regions characterized by elevated O3 concentrations. Although the findings of this study are based on a specific type of sensor and sensor model, the methodology is flexible and can be applied to other low-cost sensors with different target pollutants and sensing technologies. Furthermore, this study highlights the significance of leveraging publicly available data sources to promote the reliability of low-cost air quality sensors.

Evaluation of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Calibration Models

Calibrating Low-Cost Sensors by a Two-Phase Learning Approach for Urban Air Quality Measurement

Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration: A Survey and Critical Analysis

Leveraging machine learning algorithms to advance low-cost air sensor calibration in stationary and mobile settings

Transferability of ML-based Global Calibration Models for NO2 and NO Low-Cost Sensors

Feasibility of low-cost particulate matter sensors for long-term environmental monitoring: Field evaluation and calibration

Calibration and Inter-Unit Consistency Assessment of an Electrochemical Sensor System Using Machine Learning

Modelling calibration uncertainty in networks of environmental sensors

Poster Abstract: Robust Calibration for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors Using Historical Data

High-performance machine-learning-based calibration of low-cost nitrogen dioxide sensor using environmental parameter differentials and global data scaling

From a Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Network to Decision Support Services: Steps towards Data Calibration and Service Development

STCM: A spatio-temporal calibration model for low-cost air monitoring sensors

Intelligent Calibration and Virtual Sensing for Integrated Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors

Calibration Model of a Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Using an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System

Calibration of NO, SO2, and PM using airify: A low-cost sensor cluster for air quality monitoring

Calibrating networks of low-cost air quality sensors

Intelligent Air Pollution Sensors Calibration for Extreme Events and Drifts Monitoring

Data-Driven Techniques for Low-Cost Sensor Selection and Calibration for the Use Case of Air Quality Monitoring

Calibration of CO, NO2, and O3 Using Airify: A Low-Cost Sensor Cluster for Air Quality Monitoring

A Variational Bayesian Blind Calibration Approach for Air Quality Sensor Deployments

Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM 2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance