Impact Of Disease Management Interventions On Heart Failure Preserved Ejection Fraction In An Acute Setting

Susan Bionat,Miriam delaflor Santa Ana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.141
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Background Heart failure with preserved EF ( HFpEF) is a condition common in the older population related to multiple co morbidities. According to “The Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure “registry which was linked to Medicare administrative data (2006 - 2014) data that hospitalized patients with HFpEFa are ≥65 years of age. The final cohort included 53,065 patients with HFpEF and the overall 30-day mortality was 5.87%; at 1 year, it was 33.1%. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate was 22.2%, and it was 67.0% at 1 year. In a systematic review conducted by Kalogirou et al in 2020 on the effectiveness of Heart Failure Disease Management among HFpEF, they concluded that since patients with HFpEF are older and multi morbid, Disease Management Programs (DMP) should not rely on single disease focus but addresses predisposing presentations and a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Other components should include lifestyle modification. Based on evidence, DMP may improve mortality, hospitalization rates, self-care and quality of life. Our institution's, Heart Failure Disease Management (HFDM) team readmission data had been below the hospital and national average. We are not certain regarding the percentage of HFpEF population seen. The management of HFpEF is different and dependent on patient's co-morbidities. Aim The primary purpose of this project is to determine if the Heart Failure Disease Management (HFDM) team interventions made an impact among patients with HF Preserved Ejection Fraction in a single institution PICO question: Among patients hospitalized with HFpEF, did HFDM interventions reduce 30-day readmissions? Methods This is a quality improvement project conducted in a single tertiary 1000 bed hospital in the Texas Medical Center in 2022. Heart failure patients are referred to the HFDM primarily composed of a Nurse Practitioner in the acute setting. HFDM interventions include an individualized education with Mini Cog assessment for 65 years and over and low literacy evaluation. For patients with positive Mini Cog, family or caregiver was involved in the education. HF education was focused on self-adherence strategies, diet and fluid restriction, with provision of scale and BP if lacking. Barriers to adherence were evaluated and collaborated with Social Work, Case Management and Pharmacy if needed. Seven days post discharge follow up was scheduled with HFDM clinic if needed. For patients with HFpEF as well, the NP education focused on the precipitating co morbidity and risk factor modification. Results Total HF cases were 1758 in 2022 with the following ICD codes: 113.0,111.0, 113.2, 150.33,150.3 and 150. Due to the complexity of HFpEF and multi co morbidities, these ICD10 codes were included. We excluded combined systolic and diastolic HF. The readmission rate for the hospital was (n= 325) 19.14%. The HFDM saw 394 cases with a readmission rate of (n=57) 14.44%. Conclusion These data showed that HFDM specific interventions in the acute setting made an impact on 30-day readmission for HFpEF patients. Further data abstraction will be done on the specifics for quantification as well as their self-care and quality of life.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?