Abstract:Drop tests of dangerous goods packagings are used to evaluate resistance against damage. Testing requires reaching a defined gross mass, often achieved with additives. Yet, undesired properties or design constraints may lead to mass deviations. Adjusting drop heights is crucial but often overlooked. We developed a test stand for measuring the change in kinetic energy in drop tests to validate FEM models, aiding in adjusting drop heights accurately for varied packaging designs and contents. In the approval process of dangerous goods packagings, drop tests onto a flat, essentially unyielding surface are used to assess resistance against mechanical damage. International adopted regulations like ADR and RID define filling good dependent drop heights and filling degrees whilst the user needs to define the maximum gross mass to be tested and approved. Maximum packaging gross mass is defined conservatively and not reached in practice. To meet the defined gross mass in testing, using additives is permitted. However, in some cases, additives are not desirable due to packaging design or filling substance properties. This leads to deviations from the initial gross mass definition. Hence, a certain drop height adjustment is necessary to achieve the required impact loading. Laboratories frequently adjust drop height assuming a perfectly elastic collision that is inaccurate. Appropriate adjustment is not trivial due to energy conversion processes, for example, plastic deformation. In this work, a test stand is developed for measuring the change in kinetic energy of different packaging designs and filling substances in regulative drop tests. The experimental results are used to validate finite‐element (FE) models so that packaging properties can be varied in simulated drop test scenarios. The findings intend to describe the appropriate drop height adjustment of the respective packaging with same design but deviating gross mass to produce comparable mechanical response. The results are highly beneficial for testing laboratories, approval issuing authorities and packaging institutes confronted with the problem of testing packages with gross masses other than those to be approved.

Simulation Analysis of Packaging Box for Free Fall Airdrop

Drop Impact Analysis of Packaging System with Bar Type Elastic Critical Components

Design of Pneumatic Parachute-Packing Machine

Finite Element Analysis of Mechanical Characteristics of Dropped Eggs Based on Fluid-Solid Coupling Theory

Simulation of Assembling Cargo-Hold Spaceship Pallets

Drop Simulation Analysis of Plant Fiber Cushion Packaging Based on ANSYS

Study on Drop Impact of Packaging System Considering the Cushioning Action of Honeycomb Paperboard Box

Finite element analysis for anti-impact behavior of biogradable plant fibre bowls with foam cushioning packaging

Simulation and Experiment of Hand-held Vacuum Cleaner Host Drop

Crashworthiness optimization of crash box with 3D-printed lattice structures

On low-velocity impact response of foam-core sandwich panels

Finite Element Analysis for Dynamic Response of Cushioning System Made out of Honeycomb Paperboard and Foam

Optimization Design of MDOF Package Cushioning System Made of Polyethylene

Investigation of Cushioning Performance Produced by Corn Stalk Fibers Based on the Finite Element Analysis

Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Series Cushioning System Made with Expanded Polyethylene and Corrugated Paperboard

Impact-response analysis of the system composed of critical component and EPE cushion

Equivalence of Drop Test for Packaging Freight

Drop Test Simulation of Packaging for Dangerous Goods: An Investigation of Appropriate Drop Height Adjustment in Case of Deviating Packaging Gross Mass

The plastic collapse and energy absorption capacity of egg-box panels

Dynamic parameters of multi-cabin protective structure subjected to low-impact load – Numerical and experimental investigations

Cumulative Damage Study of Air-Dropped Vehicles with Multiple Drops Impact