When Feeling Good Feels “Wrong”: Avoiding Hedonic Consumption When It Reflects Immoral Character

Stephanie C. Lin,Tamar A. Kreps,Taly Reich

Abstract:In contrast to traditional mood repair motivations, we find that people desire to experience negative emotions in response to moral violations. Therefore, people avoid hedonic consumption after negatively valenced moral content, and feel uncomfortable when negatively valenced moral content is followed by hedonic frivolous content in social media contexts. find Furthermore, they provide evidence that they choose such products to the social order disrupted by those violations. Our papers use diverse methodologies and theoretical perspectives to examine the role of moral judgment in consumer behavior. Furthermore, while clearly focused around moral violation, our papers cover a wide range of topics (GM, CSR, hedonic consumption, conformity), and each contributes uniquely to the moral judgment literature while offering practical implications for marketers and con sumers. Thus our session should appeal to a broad audience at ACR. ABSTRACT Genetically modified (GM) food has become prevalent. Eighty-three percent of soybean In other CSR copiers are for but they than that do no at We demonstrate that being first at doing something benevolent signals something positive above and beyond the action. Put another good the the their emotional we and build to separate tragic from frivolous content (e.g., we contrib-ute to a broader understanding of the role that emotion plays in moral contexts (Haidt 2001), and when are experience negative (Coleman We qualify judgment and decision making literature on the preferences for sequences of events that improve over (Loewenstein ABSTRACT News reports of unethical behaviors have become a regular fea-ture on

Psychology,Business