Abstract:Accurate assessment of animal emotion (affect) is an important goal in animal welfare science, and in areas such as neuroscience and psychopharmacology. Direct measures of conscious emotion are not available, so assessment of animal affect has relied on measures of the behavioural and physiological components of affective states. These are important indicators but have some limitations (e.g. measuring emotional arousal rather than valence (positivity vs negativity)). Human psychology research suggests that changes in cognitive function (information processing) can also be reliable indicators of emotional state (especially valence). For example, people in negative states attend to threats, retrieve negative memories, and make negative judgements about ambiguous stimuli more than happier people. Here we review a new research area investigating the possibility that such affect-induced ‘cognitive biases’ also occur in animals. We focus on a novel ‘judgement bias’ paradigm in which animals are trained that one cue predicts a positive event and another cue predicts a less positive/negative event, and are then presented with ambiguous (intermediate) cues. The hypothesis is that animals in a negative affective state will be more likely to respond to (‘judge’) these ambiguous cues as if they predict the negative event (a ‘pessimistic’ response), than animals in a more positive state. Recent studies of rats, dogs, rhesus monkeys, starlings and humans provide face-value support for this hypothesis. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the affect manipulation treatments used in these studies, and the possibility that treatment-induced changes in feeding motivation, general activity and learning are responsible for the effects observed, and we consider whether the type of bias observed and the precise design of the judgement bias task can provide information about different types of affective state. Judgement biases may result from the influence of affect on decision-making processes including attention to and perception of the ambiguous cue, evaluation of the value and probability (expected utility) of the outcomes of different responses, and action selection. Affect might also modulate general tendencies of loss, risk and ambiguity aversion, hence biasing decisions. We discuss these possibilities in relation to theory and findings from neurobiological and psychological studies of decision-making, in order to better understand the potential mechanisms underlying judgement biases. We conclude with some specific recommendations for study design and interpretation, and suggestions for future research in this area.

Is it true that negative emotions cause more utilitarian judgements? from the influence of emotion and cognition

Effects of Regulatory Focus and Emotions on Information Preferences: The Affect-as-Information Perspective

Emotion-Driven Moral Evaluation: A Mechanistic Study Based on the Drift-Diffusion Model

Do emotions play an essential role in moral judgments?

The Role of Emotion in Moral Judgment: Evidence from Cognitive Neuroscience

Fear Facilitates Utilitarian Moral Judgments: Evidence from a Moral Judgment Task.

The Impact of the Extraversion-Introversion Personality Traits and Emotions in a Moral Decision-Making Task

Effects of Emotion on Intertemporal Decision-Making: Explanation from the Single Dimension Priority Model

Correlations of trait and state emotions with utilitarian moral judgements

Why People with More Emotion Regulation Difficulties Made a More Deontological Judgment: the Role of Deontological Inclinations

The Influence of Subliminal Emotional Priming on Person Judgment

Neural Evidence for Moral Intuition and the Temporal Dynamics of Interactions Between Emotional Processes and Moral Cognition

Moral Cognition About Harm in Anxiety Disorders: The Importance of Experienced Emotion

Influence of Negative Emotion on the Framing Effect

Who is More Utilitarian? Negative Affect Mediates the Relation Between Control Deprivation and Moral Judgment

An Emotion Regulation Role of Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Moral Judgment

Habitual Cognitive Reappraisal Was Negatively Related to Perceived Immorality in the Harm and Fairness Domains

Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms

Why do evaluative judgments affect emotion attributions? The roles of judgments about fittingness and the true self

How to judge emotions? Measuring moral emotions of lawyers in a retrospective situation

Exploring the Effects of AI Nonverbal Emotional Cues on Human Decision Certainty in Moral Dilemmas