Abstract:Purpose This research looks at the main effect of individuals' moral philosophies, idealism and relativism, and its impact on the four dimensions of the consumer ethics beliefs – active benefit, passive benefit, no harm and doing good. The moderating impact of two dominant personalities – Machiavellianism and narcissism – was also analyzed. Based on Hunt–Vitell theory of ethics, this study aims to propose that there is a positive and significant impact of more relativistic and less idealistic moral philosophies on the decreased consumer ethical perceptions and that the narcissistic/Machiavellian personality traits drive that effect. Design/methodology/approach A total of 497 survey respondents were recruited via an online platform. All respondents were asked to answer questions, which were divided into four major parts. The first part consisted of scales related to both moral philosophies, the second part had both dark personality scales, the third part questioned about their consumer ethical beliefs and the final part was related to consumer demographics. Findings Relativists had higher scores in three consumer unethical belief dimensions. Idealists were not supportive of the active and passive illegal activities, as did their positive relation with doing good aspect of the ethical beliefs. Machiavellians strengthen the positive relativism relationship. The idealistic relation of narcissists, compared to relativistic relation, is stronger on unethical decision-making for consumers. Originality/value This study contributes to the current knowledge of individual's moral philosophies and their impact on consumer ethical beliefs. It further demonstrates how the dark personalities of narcissism and Machiavellianism drive the relationship.

Moral disengagement and neutralization techniques as explanations of unethical behavior

Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap

Personal Motives, Moral Disengagement, and Unethical Decisions by Entrepreneurs: Cognitive Mechanisms on the “slippery Slope”

Investigating consumer ethical beliefs: role of moral philosophies and personality traits

When Feeling Good Feels “Wrong”: Avoiding Hedonic Consumption When It Reflects Immoral Character

Religious Orientations and Consumer Ethics

Religious But Not Ethical: The Effects of Extrinsic Religiosity, Ethnocentrism and Self-righteousness on Consumers’ Ethical Judgments

Socially conscious consumer behavior: the role of ethical self-identity and priming

Explaining Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of Theory of Planned Behavior

When Moral Tension Begets Cognitive Dissonance: An Investigation of Responses to Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior and the Contingent Effect of Construal Level

Moral disengagement in youth: A meta-analytic review

Dimensions of ethical consumption: A systematic review and future outlook

Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities

ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER RESEARCH Fooling Yourself: the Role of Internal Defense Mechanisms in Unsustainable Consumption Behavior

Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior.

Consumer Moral Dilemma in the Choice of Animal-Friendly Meat Products

Unethical consumer behavior: the role of institutional and socio-cultural factors

The Consumers’ Emotional Dog Learns to Persuade Its Rational Tail: Toward a Social Intuitionist Framework of Ethical Consumption

Moral Violations Reduce Oral Consumption

Assessing ethical consumer behavior for sustainable development: The mediating role of brand attachment

More than law‐abiding: A multi‐staged consumer study on brand morality