Abstract:More and more consumers, at least in Western developed countries, are attentive to the sustainability aspects of their food, one of which concerns animal welfare. The conflict of harming an animal for the joy of eating meat causes a moral dilemma, affecting consumers’ reactions to, and choices of, animal-friendly products. This systematic review identified 86 studies from Scopus and Web of Science. The review outlines: (1) What are the personal antecedents among consumers regarding moral conflicts?; (2) In what situation do moral conflicts occur in consumer food choice?; (3) How do consumers emotionally experience the moral dilemma?; (4) How do consumers resolve moral conflicts over animal products? Researchers have studied personal factors and situational factors that arouse consumers’ moral dilemma and how the dilemma is solved, during which emotions and dissonance come into play. When synthesizing these findings into a comprehensive model, we notice that the current research is lacking on how personal factors change and interact with situations, which limits the understanding of the real-life context of consumers’ moral dilemma as well as their choices of animal-friendly products. More in-depth studies are needed to find situational factors that contribute to this complex psychological process.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the moral dilemma faced by consumers when choosing animal - friendly meat products. Specifically, the paper aims to explore the following aspects: 1. **How do consumers' personal factors influence their moral conflicts?** - The research focuses on the influence of sociodemographic variables such as gender, cultural background, income level, and educational level on consumers' moral conflicts. - It explores consumers' internal motivations and values, such as their perception of and compassion for animals, and how these factors influence their attitudes towards meat consumption. 2. **Under what circumstances do moral conflicts occur?** - The research analyzes how specific situations of buying, preparing, and consuming meat trigger consumers' moral conflicts. - For example, situations such as media reports on meat production, contact with live animals or their carcasses, can trigger cognitive dissonance. 3. **How do consumers experience moral dilemmas emotionally?** - The research explores consumers' emotional reactions when facing moral conflicts, such as feelings of guilt, nervousness, and disgust. - In particular, when consumers are aware of animals' perceptive abilities and their similarities to humans, they will feel stronger moral conflicts. 4. **How do consumers resolve moral conflicts regarding animal products?** - The research examines the behavioral changes of consumers when facing moral conflicts, such as reducing meat consumption and choosing high - welfare meat products. - It explores the ways in which consumers relieve their internal moral conflicts, for example, through cognitive dissociation (i.e., separating moral issues from behavior psychologically). Through a systematic review of these issues, the paper hopes to construct a comprehensive model to better understand the psychological processes and decision - making mechanisms of consumers when choosing animal - friendly meat products. This helps to explain why, although many consumers express concern for animal welfare, the proportion of those actually choosing high - welfare meat products is still low, and provides theoretical support for creating a "high - welfare meat" market.

Consumer Moral Dilemma in the Choice of Animal-Friendly Meat Products

Altruism and anti-anthropocentrism shape individual choice intentions for pro-environmental and ethical meat credence attributes

Too anthropomorphized to keep distance: The role of social psychological distance on meat inclinations

Motivated Moral Outrage Among Meat-Eaters

Context, Orders of Worth, and the Justification of Meat Consumption Practices

Animal Welfare or Own Welfare: What Motivates Consumers' Choice of Cage‐Free Products?

Consumers' view on pork: Consumption motives and production preferences in ten European Union and four non-European Union countries

Resolving the Meat-Paradox: A Motivational Account of Morally Troublesome Behavior and Its Maintenance

Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review

Moral disengagement in the media discourses on meat and dairy production systems

Confronting the meat paradox in different cultural contexts: Reactions among Chinese and French participants

Do Health, Environmental and Ethical Concerns Affect Purchasing Behavior? A Meta-Analysis and Narrative Review

Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in Relation to Animal Welfare-Friendly Products: Evidence from Taiwan

A meaty matter. Pet diet and the vegetarian’s dilemma

Australian Consumers’ Knowledge and Concern for Animal Welfare in Food Production: Influences on Purchasing Intentions

Knowledge of Animal Welfare and Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions in China: A Moderated Mediation Model of Product Cognition and Empathy

Determinants of sustainable food consumption

Too Close to Eat? Solidarity with Animals, Animal Welfare and Meat Consumption

Above and beyond meat: the role of consumers’ dietary behavior for the purchase of plant-based food substitutes

Moral disengagement and neutralization techniques as explanations of unethical behavior

Consumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare