Motivated Moral Outrage Among Meat-Eaters

Hank Rothgerber,Daniel L. Rosenfeld,Savannah Keiffer,Kristen Crable,Annika Yeske,Lila Berger,Peyton Camp,Kirsten Smith,Olivia Fischer,Aryn Head

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211041536

2021-10-04

Social Psychological and Personality Science

Abstract:Many meat-eaters experience cognitive dissonance when aware that their eating behaviors contradict their moral values, such as desires to protect the environment or animals from harm. One way in which people morally disengage from their behaviors—and thus avoid dissonance—is to displace responsibility onto others. Aligning with this notion, results of three studies (total N = 1,501) suggest that expressing moral outrage at third-party transgressors reduces dissonance and preserves moral identity among meat-eaters. When participants understood their in-group as responsible for factory farming’s negative impact or read about factory farming’s harms to animals, expressing moral outrage at third-party transgressors reduced guilt and elevated self-rated moral character. Moreover, reflecting on the morally troublesome nature of meat-eating led participants to express more moral outrage at a third-party organization responsible for animal abuse, an effect eliminated by self-affirmation. These findings substantiate moral outrage as a new mechanism to justify meat consumption.

psychology, social