Abstract:Introduction: Selecting and collecting data to support appropriate primary and secondary outcomes is a critical step in designing trials that can change clinical practice. In this study, we aimed to investigate who contributes to the process of selecting and collecting trial outcomes, and how these people are involved. This work serves two main purposes: (1) it provides the trials community with evidence to demonstrate how outcomes are currently selected and collected, and (2) it allows people involved in trial design and conduct to pick apart these processes to consider how efficiencies and improvements can be made. Methods: One-with-one semi-structured interviews, supported by a topic guide to ensure coverage of key content. The Framework approach was used for thematic analysis of data, and themes were linked through constant comparison of data both within and across participant groups. Interviews took place between July 2020 and January 2021. Participants were twenty-nine international trialists from various contributor groups, working primarily on designing and/or delivering phase III pragmatic effectiveness trials. Their experience spanned various funders, trial settings, clinical specialties, intervention types, and participant populations. Results: We identified three descriptive themes encompassing the process of primary and secondary outcome selection, collection, and the publication of outcome data. Within these themes, participants raised issues around the following: 1) Outcome selection: clarity of the research question; confidence in selecting trial outcomes and how confidence decreases with increased experience; interplay between different interested parties; how patients and the public are involved in outcome selection; perceived impact of poor outcome selection including poor recruitment and/or retention; and use of core outcome sets. 2) Outcome collection: disconnect between decisions made by outcome selectors and the practical work done by outcome collectors; potential impact of outcome measures on trial participants; potential impact on trial staff workload; and use of routinely collected data. 3) Publication of outcome data: difficulties in finding time to write and revise manuscripts for publication due to time and funding constraints. Participants overwhelmingly focused on the process of outcome selection, a topic they talked about unprompted. When prompted, participants do discuss outcome collection, but poor communication between selectors and collectors at the trial design stage means that outcome selection is rarely linked with the data collection workload it generates. Discussion: People involved in the design and conduct of trials fail to connect decisions around outcome selection with data collection workload. Publication of outcome data and effective dissemination of trial results are hindered due to the project-based culture of some academic clinical trial research.

Using behavioral science to increase core outcome set use in trials

Core outcome sets for use in effectiveness trials involving people with bipolar and schizophrenia in a community-based setting (PARTNERS2): study protocol for the development of two core outcome sets

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

Study found increasing use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews and identified facilitators and barriers

Increasing Uptake through Collaboration in the Development of Core Outcome Sets: Lessons Learned at OMERACT 2023

Innovative study designs and methods for optimizing and implementing behavioral interventions to improve health.

PRACTICE: Development of a Core Outcome Set for Trials of Physical Rehabilitation in Critical Illness

A core outcome set for trials evaluating self‐management interventions in people with severe mental illness and coexisting type 2 diabetes

Core Outcome Sets in Child Health: A Systematic Review

Behavior change theory and behavior change technique use in cancer rehabilitation interventions: a secondary analysis

Using the Behaviour Change Wheel to identify barriers and targeted strategies to improve adherence in randomised clinical trials: The example of MEL-SELF trial of patient-led surveillance for melanoma

Developing a core outcome set for evaluating medication adherence interventions for adults prescribed long-term medication in primary care

Barriers and facilitators to clinical behaviour change by primary care practitioners: a theory-informed systematic review of reviews using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel

Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy

Selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions in health psychology and behavioural medicine journals: a review

Comparison of published core outcome sets with outcomes recommended in regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency: cross sectional analysis

Exploring the perspectives of selectors and collecters of trial outcome data: an international qualitative study

Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

Let's get aligned! Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in eating disorders

Strengthening Reporting of Neonatal Trials

Uptake of core outcome sets in pediatric clinical trials: a protocol