Abstract:Background: Type 2 diabetes is 2 to 3 times more common among people with severe mental illness (SMI). Self-management is crucial, with additional challenges faced by people with SMI. Therefore, it is essential that any diabetes self-management program for people with SMI addresses the unique needs of people living with both conditions and the inequalities they experience within health care services. Objective: We combined theory, empirical evidence, and co-design approaches to develop a type 2 diabetes self-management intervention for people with SMI. Methods: The development process encompassed 4 steps: step 1 involved prioritizing the mechanisms of action (MoAs) and behavior change techniques (BCTs) for the intervention. Using findings from primary qualitative research and systematic reviews, we selected candidate MoAs to target in the intervention and candidate BCTs to use. Expert stakeholders then ranked these MoAs and BCTs using a 2-phase survey. The average scores were used to generate a prioritized list of MoAs and BCTs. During step 2, we presented the survey results to an expert consensus workshop to seek expert agreement with the definitive list of MoAs and BCTs for the intervention and identify potential modes of delivery. Step 3 involved the development of trigger films using the evidence from steps 1 and 2. We used animations to present the experiences of people with SMI managing diabetes. These films were used in step 4, where we used a stakeholder co-design approach. This involved a series of structured workshops, where the co-design activities were informed by theory and evidence. Results: Upon the completion of the 4-step process, we developed the DIAMONDS (diabetes and mental illness, improving outcomes and self-management) intervention. It is a tailored self-management intervention based on the synthesis of the outputs from the co-design process. The intervention incorporates a digital app, a paper-based workbook, and one-to-one coaching designed to meet the needs of people with SMI and coexisting type 2 diabetes. Conclusions: The intervention development work was underpinned by the MoA theoretical framework and incorporated systematic reviews, primary qualitative research, expert stakeholder surveys, and evidence generated during co-design workshops. The intervention will now be tested for feasibility before undergoing a definitive evaluation in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

A core outcome set for trials evaluating self‐management interventions in people with severe mental illness and coexisting type 2 diabetes

A standard set of person-centred outcomes for diabetes mellitus: results of an international and unified approach

Development of a Supported Self-management Intervention for People With Severe Mental Illness and Type 2 Diabetes: Theory and Evidence-Based Co-design Approach

Developing a core outcome set for evaluating medication adherence interventions for adults prescribed long-term medication in primary care

Core outcome sets for use in effectiveness trials involving people with bipolar and schizophrenia in a community-based setting (PARTNERS2): study protocol for the development of two core outcome sets

Development of core outcome sets of Food for Special Medical Purposes designed for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a study protocol

What is important to people with dementia living at home? A set of core outcome items for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration

Development of a core outcome set for cardiovascular diabetology: a methodological framework

Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol

Self-Management Interventions for Adults Living with Type II Diabetes to Improve Patient-Important Outcomes: An Evidence Map

COMPAR-EU Recommendations on Self-Management Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Supporting continuous glucose monitoring for people with serious mental illness and type 2 diabetes: Protocol for a co-design study

Core outcome set for studies evaluating interventions to prevent or treat delirium in long-term care older residents: international key stakeholder informed consensus study

Core outcome sets for trials of interventions to prevent and to treat multimorbidity in adults in low and middle-income countries: the COSMOS study

Towards a core outcome set (COS) for intrinsic capacity (IC) intervention studies in adults in midlife and beyond: a scoping review to identify frequently used outcomes and measurement tools

Development of a core outcome set in the clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine for diabetic foot: A study protocol

Towards the standardisation of adult person‐reported outcome domains in diabetes research: A Consensus Statement development panel

PRACTICE: Development of a Core Outcome Set for Trials of Physical Rehabilitation in Critical Illness

An Intervention to Change Illness Representations and Self-Care of Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Development of a core outcome set for diabetes after pregnancy prevention interventions (COS-DAP): a study protocol