Let's get aligned! Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in eating disorders

Anna Victoria Brieva‐Toloza,Oliver Rumle Hovmand,Nadia Micali,Anne Bryde Christensen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3079
2024-02-23
European Eating Disorders Review
Abstract:Objective Our study aimed to review the outcome measures/assessment instruments used and to assess their heterogeneity/homogeneity in eating disorders (EDs) randomised controlled trials. Methods APA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Embase were searched in December 2022 to identify studies published between and inclusive of January 2012 and December 2022. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were: (1) complete articles published in peer‐reviewed scientific journals, which were: (2) randomised trials, (3) in a clinical setting (4) with human subjects, (5) with an ICD or DSM diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, or Bulimia Nervosa. The selected papers also: (6) used one or more standardised instruments designed to measure one or more psychometric characteristics associated with ED as a primary or secondary outcome, as judged by the authors of this systematic review, and (7) were published in English or Danish. Results Ninety one articles were included, and a total of 196 outcome measures were collected. Discussion The diversity of outcome measures in ED trials hampers result comparability and data integration. We suggest creating a core outcome measure set using the Delphi method, including clinician and patient‐reported ED assessments, along with relevant comorbidity scales.
psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?