A Monolithic Solid-State Sodium–Sulfur Battery with Al-Doped Na 3.4 Zr 2 (Si 0.8 P 0.2 O 4 ) 3 Electrolyte

Liang Lu,Yao Lu,José Antonio Alonso,Carlos Alberto López,Maria Teresa Fernández-Díaz,Bingsuo Zou,Chunwen Sun,José Antonio Alonso,Carlos Alberto López,Maria Teresa Fernández-Díaz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c13000
2021-08-31
Abstract:The limit of the energy density and increasing security issues on sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) impede their further development. Solid-state sodium metal batteries are potential candidates to replace the present SIBs. However, low ionic conductivity and poor interface contact hinder their progress. In this work, the impact of Al doping on the crystalline structure and ionic transport in Na3.4Zr2(Si0.8P0.2O4)3 was studied by neutron powder diffraction. The ionic conductivity of Na3.5Zr1.9Al0.1Si2.4P0.6O12 achieves 4.43 × 10–3 S cm–1 at 50 °C. The polarization voltage of the Na||Na symmetric battery is about 40 mV after cycling for more than 1600 h. Moreover, a solid-state sodium–sulfur battery with a monolithic structure was constructed to alleviate the interfacial resistance problems. Its specific discharge capacity can still keep 300 mA h g–1 after 480 cycles at 300 mA g–1. The work provides a promising strategy to design solid-state sodium–sulfur batteries with high performances.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c13000.Arrhenius plot of the ionic conductivities of NA1ZSP; cumulative intrusion-pore size diameter of the monolithic electrolyte of NA1ZSP; crystallographic data for the Na3.4Zr2Si2.4P0.6O12 phase in the monoclinic system (C2/c) from NPD at 295 K; crystallographic data for the Na3.5Zr1.9Al0.1Si2.4P0.6O12 phase in the monoclinic system (C2/c) from NPD at 295 K; main parameters obtained from BVEL calculations; EIS spectra for the Na–Na symmetrical battery and Na–S battery; SEM images of NAZ1SP with CNTs and elemental mappings of C, Si, and P; stripping and plating curves of the Na||Na symmetrical cell tested at different current densities at 50 °C; rate capability of the sodium–sulfur battery at different current densities; cycle performance of sodium–sulfur batteries with different sulfur loadings tested at 300 mA g–1; and SEM images of the monolithic electrolyte of the Na||Na symmetrical battery after cycle testing (PDF)BVEL (MP4)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?