Abstract:Status researchers have recognized virtue, competence, and dominance as distinct, viable routes to attaining status. While acknowledging that these routes could be compatible and may not operate independently, prior research relying on a variable-centered perspective has largely neglected their potentially complex interactions. This article integrates a person-centered perspective with the variable-centered perspective to explore how different routes conjointly shape workplace status. Study 1A (N = 537) employs latent profile analysis, an inductive person-centered method, to re-analyze existing survey data, identifying seven distinct profiles of virtue, competence, and dominance that people use to attain status. Study 1B (N = 988) confirms the existence of these profiles in an independent sample of full-time U.S. workers, albeit with nuanced differences in levels. Across our initial studies, these profiles differ in status attainment, with a profile characterized by high virtue and competence but low dominance associated with the highest status-a key discovery challenging to uncover using the variable-centered approach alone. Study 2 (N = 792), a preregistered experiment manipulating the three routes in hypothetical scenarios, gathers causal evidence confirming these profiles' varying effectiveness. Study 3 (N = 785), another preregistered experiment using refined manipulations, corroborates the findings of Study 2 and provides evidence for the relevance of these causal insights to real-life workplace contexts. This research has several crucial implications: reaching the top requires a combination of multiple routes; conflating virtue and competence under the umbrella of "prestige" obscures their unique contributions; and dominance's positive effect on status is not universally applicable.

Intersectional Group Agreement on the Occupational Order

Intergroup Consensus/disagreement in Support of Group-Based Hierarchy: an Examination of Socio-Structural and Psycho-Cultural Factors.

Role Hierarchy as a Status Construction Machine: A Replication

The Organizational Selection of Status Characteristics: Status Evaluations in an Open Source Community

Reproducing inequality through occupation: the mediating role of social dominance orientation in socioeconomic status and occupational choices

Stratification or Polarization: a Qualitative Study of the Formation of Status-Based Subgroups in China

The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion

Happiness and social stratification: A layered perspective on occupational status

How Virtue, Competence, and Dominance Conjointly Shape Status Attainment at Work: Integrating Person-Centered and Variable-Centered Approaches.

On the Importance of Social Status for Occupational Sorting

Investigating the Role of Social Status in Teacher Collaborative Groups

Workplace Status Differences and Proactive Behaviours: the Role of Perceived Insider Status and Promotion Criterion

Competence Perceptions at the Intersection of Gender and Race-Ethnicity

Intergroup Behavior in Organizations

Discussion of the Effect of Inter-group Sub-groups Using a Consensus Model Incorporating External Effective or Immobile Magnetic Fields

Research Methods in the Study of Intersectionality in Psychology: Examples Informed by a Decade of Collaborative Work With Majority World Women’s Grassroots Activism

Occupational Prestige: The Status Component of Socioeconomic Status

Shaping knowledge regarding occupation: examining the cultural underpinnings of the evolving concept of occupational identity

Expected Hierarchical Integration Reduces Perceptions of a Low Status Group As Less Competent Than a High Status Group While Maintaining the Same Level of Perception of Warmth.

Man Up, Man Down: Race–Ethnicity and the Hierarchy of Men in Female-Dominated Work

An intersectional analysis of the health status, work conditions, and nonwork conditions of the U.S. working‐classed across class, sex, race, and nativity identities