On the Importance of Social Status for Occupational Sorting

Paweł Gola

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead119

2024-01-08

The Economic Journal

Abstract:Abstract Models of self-selection predict that occupations with flat wage schedules attract workers of lower average ability. However, in certain prominent occupations such as academia and the civil service, wages are flat yet the average skill level is high. In this paper, I examine whether social status concerns can explain this puzzle. I find that within-occupation status allows flat-wage occupations to attract predominantly high-skilled workers, but only at the cost of attracting few workers overall. If, however, workers care both about within- and between-occupation status, then occupations paying flat wages can be arbitrarily large and attract workers of high average skill. I conclude that within- and between-occupation status concerns act as complements.

economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is: Why are highly skilled individuals willing to join professions with relatively flat wage structures? For example, professions such as academia, civil service, and military officers attract many highly skilled talents despite their relatively slow wage growth. This phenomenon contradicts traditional occupational choice models, which predict that professions with flat wage structures should attract low-skilled workers.

Specifically, the paper explores whether social status (including occupational prestige and intra-occupational status) can explain this phenomenon. The author establishes a model that includes social status factors to analyze how these factors influence the career choices of highly skilled individuals and draws the following conclusions:

1. **Occupational Prestige**: Occupational prestige refers to the overall status of a profession in society. If workers care about not only wages but also occupational prestige, then professions with flat wage structures can still attract highly skilled talents, provided these professions have high prestige.

2. **Intra-Occupational Status**: Intra-occupational status refers to a worker's relative position within their profession. If workers care about their status within the profession, then professions with flat wage structures can still attract highly skilled talents, but this attractiveness comes with a trade-off: the number of workers attracted may decrease because lower-ranked workers will face greater penalties.

3. **Combined Effect**: When workers care about both occupational prestige and intra-occupational status, these two factors can complement each other, allowing professions with flat wage structures to attract a large number of workers while maintaining a high skill level. Particularly, if occupational prestige is very important to workers, then even with lower wages, these professions can attract a large number of highly skilled talents.

In summary, the paper explains why highly skilled talents choose to join professions with relatively flat wage structures by introducing the factor of social status.