Urbanization drives biotic homogenization of the avian community in China

Jiewen Deng,Younan Zhu,Yuelong Luo,Yongjing Zhong,Jiahao Tu,Jiehua Yu,Jiekun He,Jiewen DENG,Younan ZHU,Yuelong LUO,Yongjing ZHONG,Jiahao TU,Jiehua YU,Jiekun HE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12815

2024-02-22

Integrative Zoology

Abstract:Comparing the β‐diversity between natural and urban communities of birds in China, this study provides empirical evidence from taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional perspectives that urbanization has driven the national‐scale biotic homogenization of avian biodiversity. The explanatory power of predictors in compositional dissimilarities decreased after urbanization, implying a potential risk of uncertainty in model predictions under further climate change and anthropogenic disturbances. Urbanization‐driven biotic homogenization has been recorded in various ecosystems on local and global scales; however, it is largely unexplored in developing countries. Empirical studies on different taxa and bioregions show conflicting results (i.e. biotic homogenization vs. biotic differentiation); the extent to which the community composition changes in response to anthropogenic disturbances and the factors governing this process, therefore, require elucidation. Here, we used a compiled database of 760 bird species in China to quantify the multiple‐site β‐diversity and fitted distance decay in pairwise β‐diversities between natural and urban assemblages to assess whether urbanization had driven biotic homogenization. We used generalized dissimilarity models (GDM) to elucidate the roles of spatial and environmental factors in avian community dissimilarities before and after urbanization. The multiple‐site β‐diversities among urban assemblages were markedly lower than those among natural assemblages, and the distance decays in pairwise similarities in natural assemblages were more rapid. These results were consistent among taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional aspects, supporting a general biotic homogenization driven by urbanization. The GDM results indicated that geographical distance and temperature were the dominant predictors of avian community dissimilarity. However, the contribution of geographical distance and climatic factors decreased in explaining compositional dissimilarities in urban assemblages. Geographical and environmental distances accounted for much lower variations in compositional dissimilarities in urban than in natural assemblages, implying a potential risk of uncertainty in model predictions under further climate change and anthropogenic disturbances. Our study concludes that taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional dimensions elucidate urbanization‐driven biotic homogenization in China.

zoology