Abstract:Impulse response analysis studies how the economy responds to shocks, such as changes in interest rates, and helps policymakers manage these effects. While Vector Autoregression Models (VARs) with structural assumptions have traditionally dominated the estimation of impulse responses, local projections, the projection of future responses on current shock, have recently gained attention for their robustness and interpretability. Including many lags as controls is proposed as a means of robustness, and including a richer set of controls helps in its interpretation as a causal parameter. In both cases, an extensive number of controls leads to the consideration of high-dimensional techniques. While methods like LASSO exist, they mostly rely on sparsity assumptions - most of the parameters are exactly zero, which has limitations in dense data generation processes. This paper proposes a novel approach that incorporates high-dimensional covariates in local projections without relying on sparsity constraints. Adopting the Orthogonal Greedy Algorithm with a high-dimensional AIC (OGA+HDAIC) model selection method, this approach offers advantages including robustness in both sparse and dense scenarios, improved interpretability by prioritizing cross-sectional explanatory power, and more reliable causal inference in local projections.

State-dependent local projections

Local projections in unstable environments

Local Projection Inference is Simpler and More Robust Than You Think

Local Projection Inference in High Dimensions

Impulse response estimation via flexible local projections

Local Projections for Applied Economics

Local projections vs. VARs: Lessons from thousands of DGPs

Bayesian Flexible Local Projections

Beyond Sparsity: Local Projections Inference with High-Dimensional Covariates

Dynamic Effects of Persistent Shocks

Adaptive Shrinkage Estimation of High Dimensional Moment Condition Model with Smooth Structural Changes

About Local Projection Impulse Response Function Reliability

Adaptive local VAR for dynamic economic policy uncertainty spillover

Nickell Bias in Panel Local Projection: Financial Crises Are Worse Than You Think

Bayesian Inference of Local Projections with Roughness Penalty Priors

Should we trust cross‐sectional multiplier estimates?

Varying Responses to Common Shocks and Complex Cross-Sectional Dependence: Dynamic Multilevel Modeling with Multifactor Error Structures for Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data

Spurious Default Probability Projections in Credit Risk Stress Testing Models

The Local Linear <path id="x1D440" d="M998 650l-8 -28q-71 -4 -86 -16t-22 -69l-50 -397q-3 -28 -4.5 -44t2 -29t6.5 -18.5t17 -10.5t24.5 -6.5t37.5 -3.5l-8 -28h-271l7 28q63 6 78 22t25 90l60 415h-2l-353 -552h-23l-130 536h-2l-70 -254q-44 -158 -47 -188q-5 -38 9 -51t71 -18l-6 -28h-241l8 28

Discount rates and cash flows: A local projection approach

Responses of Foreign Exchange Market to External Shocks: What Makes Differences?