Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to introduce and tests models for point-in-time probability of default (PD) term structures as required by international accounting standards. Corresponding accounting standards prescribe that expected credit losses (ECLs) be recognized for the impairment of financial instruments, for which the probability of default strongly embodies the included default risk. This paper fills the research gap resulting from a lack of models that expand upon existing risk management techniques, link PD term structures of different risk classes and are compliant with accounting standards, e.g. offering the flexibility for business cycle-related variations. Design/methodology/approach The author modifies the non-homogeneous continuous-time Markov chain model (NHCTMCM) by Bluhm and Overbeck (2007a, 2007b) and introduces the generalized through-the-cycle model (GTTCM), which generalizes the homogeneous Markov chain approach to a point-in-time model. As part of the overall ECL estimation, an empirical study using Standard and Poor’s (S&P) transition data compares the performance of these models using the mean squared error. Findings The models can reflect observed PD term structures associated with different time periods. The modified NHCTMCM performs best at the expense of higher complexity and only its cumulative PD term structures can be transferred to valid ECL-relevant unconditional PD term structures. For direct calibration to these unconditional PD term structures, the GTTCM is only slightly worse. Moreover, it requires only half of the number of parameters that its competitor does. Both models are useful additions to the implementation of accounting regulations. Research limitations/implications The tests are only carried out for 15-year samples within a 35-year span of available S&P transition data. Furthermore, a point-in-time forecast of the PD term structure requires a link to the business cycle, which seems difficult to find, but is in principle necessary corresponding to the accounting requirements. Practical implications Research findings are useful for practitioners, who apply and develop the ECL models of financial accounting. Originality/value The innovative models expand upon the existing methodologies for assessing financial risks, motivated by the practical requirements of new financial accounting standards.

Spurious Default Probability Projections in Credit Risk Stress Testing Models

Predicting Default Probabilities for Stress Tests: A Comparison of Models

Evaluating the Default Risk of Bond Portfolios with Extreme Value Theory

Borrower Level Models for Stress Testing Corporate Probability of Default and the Quantification of Model Risk

Modeling stochastic recovery rates and dependence between default rates and recovery rates within a generalized credit portfolio framework

Retail credit stress testing using a discrete hazard model with macroeconomic factors

Predicting Credit Default Probabilities Using Bayesian Statistics and Monte Carlo Simulations

Default risk modeling beyond the first-passage approximation: Position-dependent killing

Simulating Credit Loss Distributions: Empirical Versus the Vasicek Model

A comparative analysis of current credit risk models

A Proposed Simulation Technique for Population Stability Testing in Credit Risk Scorecards

Estimating Default Probability and Correlation using Stan

Estimating Probabilities of Default for Low Default Portfolios

Risk assessment for financial accounting: modeling probability of default

Capital allocation for credit portfolios under normal and stressed market conditions

Model Risk in Credit Portfolio Models

Stressing Dynamic Loss Models

Systematic Systemic Stress Tests

Default Process Modeling and Credit Valuation Adjustment

Credit risk assessment of fixed income portfolios : an analytical approach

Credit Calibration with Structural Models: The Lehman case and Equity Swaps under Counterparty Risk