Abstract:There is a widely application of panel data estimation in accounting and finance research. The approach is well accepted , because the pooled panel data provide rich information as compared to either cross-sections or time series data structure. However, within panel data structure , variables of interest are often cross-sectionally and serially correlated and as a result , OLS standard errors would be biased when panel data are used in the regression analysis. Several techniques , for example firm dummy variables, one-way cluster-robust standard errors, Fama-MacBeth procedure, and Newey-West procedure , are documented as a solution in analyzing panel data. These techniques to some extent correct either cross-sectional correlation or serial correlation . None is designed to deal with correlations in two dimensions (across firms and across time). With panel data structure , correlations are more likely to appear in two dimensions with both firm effects and time effects . This study suggests that two-way cluster-robust standard errors approach can correct both cross-sectional correlation and serial correlation and therefore should be considered as a better alternative in handling panel data. Nonetheless, two-way cluster-robust standard errors approach could be biased when applying to a finite sample . This study uses a real data set and constructs an empirical application of the estimation procedures of two-way cluster-robust regression estimation with and without finite-sample adjustment and the results show that finite-sample adjusted estimates are superior to unadjusted asymptotic estimates.

Nickell Bias in Panel Local Projection: Financial Crises Are Worse Than You Think

Local projections in unstable environments

Local Projection Inference is Simpler and More Robust Than You Think

Local projections vs. VARs: Lessons from thousands of DGPs

Two-Way Cluster-Robust Standard Errors—A Methodological Note on What Has Been Done and What Has Not Been Done in Accounting and Finance Research

Neglected dynamics and spatial dependence on panel data: consequences for convergence of the usual static model estimators

Detecting Neglected Nonlinearity in Dynamic Panel Data with Time-Varying Conditional Heteroskedasticity

A Bias-Corrected Cd Test for Error Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel Data Models with Latent Factors

Inference In Partially Identified Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects

Local Projection Inference in High Dimensions

A Uni ed Estimation Approach for Spatial Dynamic Panel Data Models : Stability , Spatial Cointegration and Explosive Roots

Spatial panels : random components vs . xed e ¤ ects Lung

Fixed-Effects in Empirical Accounting Research

Revisiting the location of FDI in China: A panel data approach with heterogeneous shocks

Influence Analysis with Panel Data

Linear Regression for Dependently Censored Panel Duration Models with Nonadditive Fixed E ff ects

Bias Correction for Fixed Effects Spatial Panel Data Models

How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-In-Differences Estimates?

State-dependent local projections

Shrinkage Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Models with Interactive Fixed Effects

Estimation of fixed effects semiparametric single-index panel model with spatio-temporal correlated errors