Abstract:Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the clear aligners with the traditional fixed appliances in the treatment of premolars extraction complex cases using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). Material and methods: A single-centre, 2-parallel groups RCT with two arms. Forty severe crowding patients (14 males, 26 females; mean age: 21.40±2.42) who required four first premolars extraction were included and randomly allocated into two treatment groups: clear aligners therapy group (CAT), and fixed appliances therapy group (FAT). Cases complexities were measured on pre-treatment records using the Discrepancy index (DI). Post-treatment records were evaluated using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). Two sample t-tests and Fisher's Exact tests were used to test for significant differences between the two groups. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.006 using Bonferroni's correction. Results: For the DI, the mean scores were 32.25 (± 4.33) in the CAT group and 33 (± 7.92) in the FAT group. In the CAT group, the total OGS score ranged between 6-33 points with an average of 17.50(± 7.41), whereas the total score in the FAT group went between 4-30 points with an average of 12.89 (± 6.31) with no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.05). When comparison of the successful cases between the two groups was made, 11 cases received passing scores, and 9 cases received failing scores in the CAT group. Whereas in the FAT group, 17 cases received passing scores, and 3 received a failing score. No statistically significant differences were found in the passing rates between of the CAT and FAT groups (P = 0.421). Conclusions: According to the ABO-OGS total scores, there was no significant difference between the clear aligners and fixed appliances in the treatment of class I severe crowding cases with first premolars extraction in young adults. There were no differences between the two techniques in the OGS components scores except for the occlusal contacts, which were significantly better with the fixed appliances. When comparing the number of successful and failed cases between the two groups, no significant differences were noted, with the fixed appliances having a 30% higher success rate than the clear aligners, which must be considered clinically when choosing between these two techniques in the complex orthodontic cases treatment.

Comparison of anxiety, pain, and quality of life in individuals with mild or moderate malocclusion between conventional fixed orthodontic treatment versus Invisalign: a randomised clinical trial

Evaluation and Comparative Assessment of Clear Aligners and Conventional Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Pediatric Populations: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Comparison of Short-Term Oral Impacts Experienced by Patients Treated with Invisalign or Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliances

Comparison of fixed braces and clear braces for malocclusion treatment

The Effect of Treatment With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Severe Crowding: A One-Year Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life Changes in Patients Receiving Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliances and Clear Aligner Therapy: A Questionnaire Based Cross-sectional Study

Comparison of pain intensity and impacts on oral health-related quality of life between orthodontic patients treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of aligners on patients' oral health-related quality of life and anxiety: a prospective pilot study

Comparative Study of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQL) between Different Types of Orthodontic Treatment

The Impact of Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment on the Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life between a Modified Aligner Appliance with Ni-Ti Springs and the Traditional Fixed Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Influence of pain duration and severity on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction during adult treatment with clear aligners

A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies

Periodontal health status, oral microbiome, white-spot lesions and oral health related to quality of life-clear aligners versus fixed appliances: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Risk of root resorption between Invisalign and fixed orthodontic treatment: A retrospective study

A comparative study of changes occurring in the transversal direction of the dental arch in patients suffering from moderate crowding after treatment with three different orthodontic techniques

Treatment effectiveness of young adults using clear aligners versus buccal fixed appliances in class I malocclusion with first premolar extraction using the ABO-Objective Grading System: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Smile outcome comparison of Invisalign and traditional fixed-appliance treatment: A case-control study

Comparison of acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children in mixed dentition treated with removable acrylic appliances and Invisalign first: a cross-sectional study

Comparison of Occlusal Digital Analysis Using T-Scan in Orthognathic Surgery with Only Conventional Orthodontic Patients

Comparison of the accuracy of three interproximal reduction methods used in clear aligner treatment

Comparative evaluation of alveolar bone remodeling and root length changes in fixed appliances versus clear aligners: A retrospective cohort study on skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment