People quasi-randomly assigned to farm rice are more collectivistic than people assigned to farm wheat

Thomas Talhelm,Xiawei Dong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44770-w

IF: 16.6

2024-02-27

Nature Communications

Abstract:Abstract The rice theory of culture argues that the high labor demands and interdependent irrigation networks of paddy rice farming makes cultures more collectivistic than wheat-farming cultures. Despite prior evidence, proving causality is difficult because people are not randomly assigned to farm rice. In this study, we take advantage of a unique time when the Chinese government quasi-randomly assigned people to farm rice or wheat in two state farms that are otherwise nearly identical. The rice farmers show less individualism, more loyalty/nepotism toward a friend over a stranger, and more relational thought style. These results rule out confounds in tests of the rice theory, such as temperature, latitude, and historical events. The differences suggest rice-wheat cultural differences can form in a single generation.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to verify the Rice Theory, that is, whether traditional rice cultivation indeed leads to a more collectivist rice - farming culture than wheat - farming culture. Although previous studies have provided evidence to support this theory, it is very difficult to prove causality because people are not randomly assigned to plant rice or wheat. This study takes advantage of a unique historical period when the Chinese government almost randomly assigned people to one of two state - owned farms to plant rice or wheat, and these two farms were almost identical in other aspects. By comparing the cultural differences between these two farms, the study aims to exclude the influence of potential confounding factors such as temperature, latitude and historical events, so as to test the validity of the Rice Theory more clearly.