How Rice Fights Pandemics: Nature–Crop–Human Interactions Shaped COVID-19 Outcomes

Thomas Talhelm,Cheol-Sung Lee,Alexander S. English,Shuang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221107209
IF: 4.56
2022-07-21
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Abstract:Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Ahead of Print. Wealthy nations led health preparedness rankings in 2019, yet many poor nations controlled COVID-19 better. We argue that a history of rice farming explains why some societies did better. We outline how traditional rice farming led to tight social norms and low-mobility social networks. These social structures helped coordinate societies against COVID-19. Study 1 compares rice- and wheat-farming prefectures within China. Comparing within China allows for controlled comparisons of regions with the same national government, language family, and other potential confounds. Study 2 tests whether the findings generalize to cultures globally. The data show rice-farming nations have tighter social norms and less-mobile relationships, which predict better COVID outcomes. Rice-farming nations suffered just 3% of the COVID deaths of nonrice nations. These findings suggest that long-run cultural differences influence how rice societies—with over 50% of the world's population—controlled COVID-19. The culture was critical, yet the preparedness rankings mostly ignored it.
psychology, social
What problem does this paper attempt to address?