Abstract:Existing simplified procedures for evaluating soil liquefaction potential or for estimating excess pore pressures during earthquakes are typically based on undrained cyclic tests performed on saturated soil samples under controlled loading and boundary conditions. Under such conditions, the effect of excess pore pressure (ue) dissipation and redistribution to neighboring soil layers cannot be accounted for. Existing simplified procedures treat liquefiable layers as isolated soil layers without any boundary conditions even if dense and loose layers are very thin, permeable, and adjacent to each other. However, redistribution is likely to increase and decrease ue in the neighboring dense and loose layers respectively. Until now, no procedure short of fully coupled numerical analysis is available to estimate the importance of redistribution. This paper presents an approximate analytical procedure for assessing the effects of ue redistribution in (1) soil layers that would have liquefied if they were undrained, and (2) soil layers that would have not liquefied even if undrained. It is found that a layer that is initially assumed liquefied under undrained conditions might not even liquefy accounting for the ue redistribution to neighboring layers. On the other hand, a layer initially assumed to not liquefy can develop significant ue and can even liquefy due to pore pressure migration from the neighboring layers. Thus, accounting for redistributed ue is important for liquefaction consequence assessment quantification, particularly in systems that span the depth of these effects like deep foundations. Migration of u toward the tip of a pile can reduce its capacity, even if the tip is embedded in a dense sand layer. On the other hand, if redistribution can result in the reduction of ue in initially assumed liquefied layers, risks associated with liquefaction might be avoided. A criterion is also developed to evaluate the thicknesses of a layer below which redistribution could prevent liquefaction even if the layer is deemed liquefied according to the existing liquefaction-triggering procedures. Finally, the proposed procedure is illustrated by application to selected shaking events of centrifuge tests involving liquefaction of layered soil profiles. The predictions from the procedure matched the centrifuge test results reasonably.

Empirical Probability Distribution Models for Soil-Layer Thicknesses of Liquefiable Ground

Characterizing the Liquefaction Potential and Pore Pressure Generation of Silty Sands Through the Energy-Based Approach in the Framework of Critical State Soil Mechanics

A latent Gaussian process model for the spatial distribution of liquefaction manifestation

Improving Soil Liquefaction Prediction Through an Extensive Database and Innovative Ground Motion Characterization: A Case Study of Port Island Liquefied Site

Dynamic Response and Load Distribution of Pile Groups in Layered Liquefiable Ground

A robust empirical model to estimate earthquake-induced excess pore water pressure in saturated and non-saturated soils

Probability Assessment of Land Use Suitability with Ground Surface Ruptures Induced by Strong Earthquakes

A Novel Peridynamic Solution for Modelling Saturated Soil-Pore Fluid Interaction in Liquefaction Analysis

Probabilistic failure envelopes of strip foundations on soils with non-stationary characteristics of undrained shear strength

Predicting ground vibrations from railway tunnels using an improved 2.5D FEM-PML model with soil spatial variability

Effects of Layered Liquefiable Deposits on the Seismic Response of an Underground Structure

Probabilistic Evaluation of Earthquake-Induced Liquefaction Using Bayesian Network Based on A Side-by-Side SPT-CPT Database

Characterizing anisotropic spatial variations of uncertain mechanical parameters for clay layer using incomplete probability data

Peridynamics-based large-deformation simulations for near-fault landslides considering soil uncertainty

Probabilistic modeling of offshore deep cement mixing improved ground

Effects of Excess Pore Pressure Redistribution in Liquefiable Layers

A Bayesian approach to develop simple run-out distance models: loess landslides in Heifangtai Terrace, Gansu Province, China

Evaluation of SPT-Based Liquefaction Assessment Methods in China

Multivariate probability distributions for index and mechanical clay parameters in Shenzhen

Investigations of Soil Models Used to Study Soil Base Liquefaction

Run-out distance exceedance probability evaluation and hazard zoning of an individual landslide