Abstract:Objective: To investigate the compensatory mechanism of maintaining the sagittal balance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients with different pelvic incidence (PI). Methods: This was a retrospective imaging observation study. Patients in our department with degenerative lumbar scoliosis between 2017 and 2019 were reviewed. A total of 36 patients were eligible and included in the present study. The average age of those patients was 64.22 years, including 8 men and 28 women. The coronal and sagittal parameters were measured on full-length spine X-ray film, including globe kyphosis (GK), lumber lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), sagittal shift angle, Cobb angle, coronal shift angle, and vertebra. The anterior pelvic plane angle (APPA) and pelvic parameters were also measured, including the pelvic tilt (PT), the PI, and the sacral slope (SS). PI-LL, LL-SS, and GK-SS were calculated. Traditional pelvic tilt was also calculated using the following formula: cPT = PI × 0.37-7. These patients were divided into two groups according to their PI values. The patients' PI value in Group 1 was smaller than 50°. The patients' PI value in Group 2 was equal to or larger than 50°. Results: These patients' SS, PT, PI, LL, TLK, TK, and GK were 28.70° ± 11.36°, 23.28° ± 6.55°, 52.00° ± 11.03°, 31.66° ± 14.12°, 12.12° ± 14.9°, 17.81° ± 13.53°, and -13.17° ± 16.27°. The sagittal shift angle, the APPA, the Cobb angle, the coronal shift angle, vertebra, PI-LL, cPT, APPA-4, LL-SS, and GK-SS were 4.38° ± 5.75°, -12.55° ± 8.83°, 30.03° ± 12.59°, 2.40° ± 2.13°, 4.08 ± 0.93, 19.86° ± 10.97°, 12.35° ± 4.55°, -8.30° ± 9.07°, 3.30° ± 8.82°, and 15.53° ± 9.83°, respectively. There was no significant difference between PT and cPT + APPA-4 or between cPT and PT-APPA+4. There was significant difference between PT and cPT + APPA or between cPT and PT-APPA. This demonstrated that the APPA-4 is reliable as degree of the pelvic sagittal retroversion. There were significant differences in SS, PI, LL, TLK, GK, APPA, PT-APPA, PT-APPA+4, cPT, and APPA-4 between Group 1 and Group 2. There were no significant differences in PT, TK, sagittal shift angle, SVA, Cobb angle, coronal shift angle, vertebra number, PI-LL, cPT + APPA, cPT + APPA-4, LL-SS, and GK-SS between Group 1 and Group 2. The Pearson tests showed that PI-LL had significant correlations with TK, LL, sagittal shift angle, SVA, and LL-SS. There was no significant correlation between PI-LL and Cobb angle, GK, TLK, APPA, vertebra, Coronal Shift Angle, or GK-SS. Conclusion: The APPA-4 is reliable as degree of the pelvic sagittal retroversion. In degenerative lumbar scoliosis, patients with smaller PI tended to rely more on the pelvic retroversion to maintain the sagittal balance than patients with larger PI, or patients with smaller PI were likely to start up the pelvic retroversion compensatory mechanism earlier than the patients with larger PI.

A simple method for the selection of valid spinopelvic parameters and lumbar lordosis in patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae

Analysis of Spinopelvic Parameters and Lumbar Lordosis in Patients with Transitional Lumbosacral Vertebrae, with Special Reference to Sacralization and Lumbarization

Computer Simulation of Two-level Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Severe Thoracolumbar Kyphosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis

A Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Restoring Pelvic Balance and Health-related Quality of Life in High-grade Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis: Prospective Multicenter Cohort of 61 Young Patients

How to Make a More Optimal Surgical Plan for Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: a Comparative Study Based on the Changes of the Sagittal Alignment and Selection of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra

Using spinopelvic parameters to estimate residual lumbar lordosis assuming previous lumbosacral fusion-a study of normative values

Impact of Pelvic Anteversion on Spinopelvic Alignment in an Asymptomatic Population: a Dynamic Perspective of Standing and Sitting

"Reasonable threshold" of spinopelvic parameters after fixation on distal stenosis in patients with degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis: A STROBE-compliant article

Comparison of sagittal spinopelvic parameters in different types of double-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study

Radiological Analysis of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis in Relation to Pelvic Incidence.

Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters in 2-Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Effect of lumbosacral transitional vertebra on developmental alterations of the hip: a quantitative investigation of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex via whole-body computed tomography

The L1 spino-pelvic (L1SP) angle: a simplified approach for the assessment of the PI-LL mismatch in hip surgery

Analysis of Radiographic Spinopelvic Parameters in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Kyphoscoliosis

Radiological analysis for thoracolumbar disc herniation in spinopelvic sagittal alignment: A retrospective study.

Strategies for Minimizing the Effects of Observer Variability on Sagittal Parameter Measurements of the Spine

Selecting the Vertebra above Sagittal Stable Vertebra as the Distal Fusion Level in Scheuermann's Kyphosis: A Prospective Study with a Minimum of 2-Year Follow-Up

Compensatory Mechanism of Maintaining the Sagittal Balance in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients with Different Pelvic Incidence

Validation and Reliability Analysis of the Spinal Deformity Study Group Classification for L5-S1 Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Spino-pelvic sagittal parameters in patients with degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis combined with lumbar stenosis syndrome

Accuracy and Reliability of Standing Lateral Lumbar Radiographs for Measurements of Spinopelvic Parameters