Comparison of two 3D scanning software to identify facial features: a prospective instrument to predict difficult airway

Alexander Rocuts,Bibiana Avella-Molano,Amanda Behr,Farhan Lakhani,Bryant Bolds,Matias Riveros-Amado,Efrain Riveros-Perez,Bryant Bolds II,Matias Riveros-Amado and Efrain Riveros-Perez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00362-2
2024-02-24
Perioperative Medicine
Abstract:Clinical airway assessment has limited predictive ability to anticipate difficult airway. Three-dimensional (3D) technologies have emerged in medicine as valuable tools in different settings including innovation and surgical planning. Three-dimensional facial scanning could add value to clinical measurements and two-dimensional models to assess the airway. However, commonly used high-fidelity scans are expensive. This study aims to compare the accuracy of the measurements made by the Scandy Pro app as a cost-effective alternative to high-fidelity scans made by the Artec Space Spider. We also aim to evaluate the interobserver variability for the measurements performed with Scandy Pro.
surgery,anesthesiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?