Abstract:Introduction The accuracy of tooth segmentation in intraoral scans is crucial for performing virtual setups and appliance fabrication. Hence, the objective of this study was to estimate and compare the accuracy of automated tooth segmentation generated by the artificial intelligence of dentOne software (DIORCO Co, Ltd, Yongin, South Korea) and Medit Ortho Simulation software (Medit Corp, Seoul, South Korea). Methods Twelve maxillary and mandibular pretreatment dental scan sets comprising 286 teeth were collected for this investigation from the archives of the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. The scans were imported as standard tessellation language files into both dentOne and Medit Ortho Simulation software. Automatic segmentation was run on each software. The number of successfully segmented teeth vs failed segmentations was recorded to determine the success rate of automated segmentation of each program. Evaluation of success and/or failure was based on the software's identification of the teeth and the quality of the segmentation. The mesiodistal tooth width measurements after segmentation using both tested software programs were compared with those measured on the unsegmented scan using Meshmixer software (Autodesk, San Rafael, Calif). The unsegmented scans served as the reference standard. Results A total of 288 teeth were examined. Successful identification rates were 99% and 98.3% for Medit and dentOne, respectively. Success rates of segmenting the lingual surfaces of incisors were significantly higher in Medit than in dentOne (93.7% vs 66.7%, respectively; P <0.001). DentOne overestimated the mesiodistal width of canines (0.11 mm, P = 0.032), premolars (0.22 mm, P < 0.001), and molars (0.14 mm, P = 0.043) compared with the reference standard, whereas Medit overestimated the mesiodistal width of premolars only (0.13 mm, P = 0.006). Bland-Altman plots showed that mesiodistal tooth width agreement limits exceeded 0.2 mm between each software and the reference standard. Conclusions Both artificial intelligence-segmentation software demonstrated acceptable accuracy in tooth segmentation. There is a need for improvement in segmenting incisor lingual tooth surfaces in dentOne. Both software programs tended to overestimate the mesiodistal widths of segmented teeth, particularly the premolars. Artificial intelligence-segmentation needs to be manually adjusted by the operator to ensure accuracy. However, this still does not solve the problem of proximal surface reconstruction by the software.

Assessment of the accuracy of imaging software for 3D rendering of the upper airway, usable in orthodontic and craniofacial clinical settings

ACCURACY OF DEEP LEARNING-BASED UPPER AIRWAY SEGMENTATION

Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of in Vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.

Mandibular bone segmentation from CT scans: Quantitative and qualitative comparison among software

Reliability assessment of craniofacial and airway measurements: a comparative study between multidetector computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography

Accuracy of Tooth Segmentation in the Digital Kesling Setup of Two Different Software Programs: A Retrospective Study

Evaluating free segmentation tools for CBCT‐derived models: Cost‐effective solutions

Evaluation of the accuracy of automated tooth segmentation of intraoral scans using artificial intelligence-based software packages

Comparison of two 3D scanning software to identify facial features: a prospective instrument to predict difficult airway

In Vivo Analysis of Intraoral Scanner Precision Using Open-Source 3D Software

Automatic 3D reconstruction of an anatomically correct upper airway from endoscopic long range OCT images

Accuracy of full arch three-dimensional dentition models from intraoral scanners

Clinical Evaluation of Semi-Automatic Opensource Algorithmic Software Segmentation of the Mandibular Bone: Practical Feasibility and Assessment of a New Course of Action.

The Accuracy of Orthodontic Imaging Management Software in Virtual Simulating Orthognathic Surgery

Do intraoral scanning technologies affect the trueness of dental arches with crowding, diastema, and edentulous spaces? A clinical perspective

The effect of imaging programs and segmentation methods on the accuracy of volume measurements of teeth

A unique artificial intelligence-based tool for automated CBCT segmentation of mandibular incisive canal

Digital three-dimensional visualization of intrabony periodontal defects for regenerative surgical treatment planning

Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐based segmentation of the mandibular canal in CBCT

Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Prediction in Orthognathic Cases Using Dolphin Three-Dimensional Software

Accuracy of Tooth Segmentation Algorithm Based on Deep Learning